I ran find-orientations and fit-grains on the single GE ruby example problem, and some of the results differed in nontrivial ways.
For scan 0 (there were 6 scans done by the script), the orientations (exp_map) and the centroids (t_vec) were very close, but the completeness of the reference example was 99.6% while the newly computed value was 94.3%. Also, the logarithmic strains in the new results were all above 1e-4 in magnitude, while the reference values were nearly an order of magnitude smaller.
(hexrd-dev) (MacBook-Pro: include) 1394. cat results-deb/grains.out
# grain ID completeness chi^2 exp_map_c[0] exp_map_c[1] exp_map_c[2] t_vec_c[0] t_vec_c[1] t_vec_c[2] inv(V_s)[0,0] inv(V_s)[1,1] inv(V_s)[2,2] inv(V_s)[1,2]*sqrt(2) inv(V_s)[0,2]*sqrt(2) inv(V_s)[0,1]*sqrt(2) ln(V_s)[0,0] ln(V_s)[1,1] ln(V_s)[2,2] ln(V_s)[1,2] ln(V_s)[0,2] ln(V_s)[0,1]
0 0.942797 1.339631e-04 6.6918649107126982e-01 -9.8641582962873697e-01 7.3667831533290939e-01 3.9827841460512801e-03 8.0340971654415788e-05 1.1711638895589634e-03 1.0001806598927279e+00 1.0001748226350993e+00 1.0002199218597727e+00 2.4938617558299570e-06 1.6486719034722785e-05 -1.2477506200928512e-05 -1.8064346885934965e-04 -1.7480731494045294e-04 -2.1989761102601097e-04 -1.7631299850951967e-06 -1.1655544109695089e-05 8.8213716029227738e-06
(hexrd-dev) (MacBook-Pro: include) 1395. cat ../results/RUBY_SWEEP_0/grains.out
# grain ID completeness chi2 xi[0] xi[1] xi[2] tVec_c[0] tVec_c[1] tVec_c[2] vInv_s[0] vInv_s[1] vInv_s[2] vInv_s[4]*sqrt(2) vInv_s[5]*sqrt(2) vInv_s[6]*sqrt(2) ln(V[0,0]) ln(V[1,1]) ln(V[2,2]) ln(V[1,2]) ln(V[0,2]) ln(V[0,1])
0 0.996441 6.789419e-05 6.6915764420116963e-01 -9.8645691090758181e-01 7.3671268551912705e-01 7.4356099401517420e-04 -3.2797215724751140e-04 3.0348376087913679e-03 9.9999915956922780e-01 9.9997970456305807e-01 1.0000543901727046e+00 -1.9101227709367569e-05 2.2342264249539348e-05 -3.7211661743067385e-06 8.4055937642900151e-07 2.0295737572567815e-05 -5.4388477619290562e-05 1.3506356617922513e-05 -1.5797925807544246e-05 2.6311829548237176e-06
I ran find-orientations and fit-grains on the single GE ruby example problem, and some of the results differed in nontrivial ways.
For scan 0 (there were 6 scans done by the script), the orientations (exp_map) and the centroids (t_vec) were very close, but the completeness of the reference example was 99.6% while the newly computed value was 94.3%. Also, the logarithmic strains in the new results were all above 1e-4 in magnitude, while the reference values were nearly an order of magnitude smaller.