When I see a lot of OGMS-based ontologies, I see lots of shadow classes created.
For example
- neurological disease has material basis neurological disorder
- heart disease has material basis heart disorder
is this considered good practice? what are best practices for naming explicit shadow classes? what is a good exemplar ontology here?
(this shadow class problem persists with other branches, I often see X disease, X diagnosis, X disorder, X process, .... but for the purposes of this issue I am interested in disease and disorder branches)
When I see a lot of OGMS-based ontologies, I see lots of shadow classes created.
For example
is this considered good practice? what are best practices for naming explicit shadow classes? what is a good exemplar ontology here?
(this shadow class problem persists with other branches, I often see X disease, X diagnosis, X disorder, X process, .... but for the purposes of this issue I am interested in disease and disorder branches)