-
|
@yuxiqian In the following code, why do we check for errorMessage.contains(RESUME_TOKEN) ? For errors messages like: It simply fails because of that added check. If we make the code like this: return errorMessage.contains(RESUME_TOKEN) Then it will cover this case also. What do you think ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
|
Hello @sjmittal, thanks for your detailed writeup. One thing I'm not quite sure about is if concatenating Agree this code needs to be fixed, perhaps by matching full error messages instead of keywords. Would you like to take this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@yuxiqian I have created a JIRA for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-38550
I have also created a PR for this: #4161
I think this would be better to review the change. I have incorporated your suggestion.
Let me know if this is good to merge.