Skip to content

Conversation

@johnbilt
Copy link
Contributor

Details

Add created and created_by fields to the segment metadata model

Jira Issue (if relevant)

Jira URL:

Related PRs

Not applicable

Submitter PR Checks

(tick as appropriate)

  • PR completes task/fixes bug
  • API version has been incremented if necessary
  • ADR status has been updated, and ADR implementation has been recorded
  • Documentation updated (README, etc.)
  • PR added to Jira Issue (if relevant)
  • Follow-up stories added to Jira

Reviewer PR Checks

(tick as appropriate)

  • PR completes task/fixes bug
  • Design makes sense, and fits with our current code base
  • Code is easy to follow
  • PR size is sensible
  • Commit history is sensible and tidy

Info on PRs

The checks above are guidelines. They don't all have to be ticked, but they should all have been considered.

@johnbilt johnbilt requested a review from a team as a code owner May 13, 2025 20:58
@johnbilt johnbilt closed this Nov 20, 2025
@johnbilt johnbilt force-pushed the segment-created-metadata branch from 1d16e05 to 9aa8853 Compare November 20, 2025 12:11
@johnbilt johnbilt reopened this Nov 21, 2025
@j616 j616 changed the title Add segment created metadata Proposal to add segment created metadata - rejected Nov 25, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@j616 j616 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your work on this. This looks good. I've updated the PR title so it doesn't confuse people in the changelog.

@j616
Copy link
Contributor

j616 commented Nov 25, 2025

Looks like there's one more linting error. I'll merge once thats sorted

@j616
Copy link
Contributor

j616 commented Nov 25, 2025

Slightly unhelpful message there. But does this need rebasing again?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants