Skip to content

Commit c1f9d34

Browse files
authored
Minor terminology and orthography fixes for topic K discussion paper (#592)
* Replaced one remaining reference to PoA (proof of association) with Cryptographic Binding in topic K discussion paper. * For consistency pluralised “attestation” in section title “3.4 Cryptographic Binding of attestations” in topic K discussion paper.
1 parent 85db1f9 commit c1f9d34

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

docs/discussion-topics/k-combined-presentation-of-attestations.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ about the User than necessary (e.g., the User’s PID number). To mitigate this,
216216
selective disclosure mechanisms SHALL be used to conceal such attributes when
217217
they are not required for the specific transaction.
218218

219-
### 3.4 Cryptographic Binding of attestation
219+
### 3.4 Cryptographic Binding of attestations
220220
This is an envisioned cryptographic mechanism that allows
221221
a Wallet Unit to prove that the private keys corresponding to two (or more) public keys
222222
are managed by the same WSCD.
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ This mechanism offers the following advantages
236236
- **Privacy-preserving correlation**:
237237
Attestations can be linked without using identifying attributes that may
238238
lead to tracking if not properly hidden during presentation. For example, including
239-
a PID number in attestations could enable linking; PoA avoids this by
239+
a PID number in attestations could enable linking; Cryptographic Binding avoids this by
240240
offering cryptographic correlation.
241241

242242
This mechanism **does not, by itself, guarantee** that two attestations belong to the same User.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)