-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 174
perf(sinsp): sinsp_thread_manager::get_field_accessor #2705
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf(sinsp): sinsp_thread_manager::get_field_accessor #2705
Conversation
Avoid unnecessary extra lookup Signed-off-by: Angelo Puglisi <[email protected]>
Have the container_id accessor as an attribute, avoiding sinsp_thread_manager::get_field_accessor at each call. Signed-off-by: Angelo Puglisi <[email protected]>
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2705 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 76.91% 76.91% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 294 294
Lines 30862 30865 +3
Branches 4689 4692 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 23739 23740 +1
- Misses 7123 7125 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Looks like an obvious change provided the value of accessor remains constant between calls to get_container_id(), which I presume is the case here.
|
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 18a15163d97d238f11942a2f49bdce7ae59e80e5
|
Happy to detail this more! |
|
/milestone 0.23.0 |
ekoops
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: deepskyblue86, ekoops, terror96 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
Any specific area of the project related to this PR?
/area libsinsp
Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Improve
sinsp_threadinfo::get_container_id()performance. Based on my test with microbenchmarking there's a ~16% performance improvement.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: