Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
It seems like a creative use of context poisoning. Its contextual guidance for the LLM to follow. These files just end up as part of the context in your chat sessions. so having these sections helps enforce some alignment. Agree that these sections might benefit from something like : Note Following 'Execution Flow' is for context alignment and not indended for human consumption. I'm not sure they can be abstracted because they often end up having content specific to the spec you're working on. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
templates/spec.mdandtemplates/plan.mdboth have "Execution Flow" sections at the top.As best I can tell, these are a guide for how to fill out the rest of the document-- so why are they included in the rendered
spec.md/plan.mdfiles? They only seem to interfere with human readability. It seems like the part intended for human consumption inspec.mdstarts atUser Scenarios and Testing, and forplan.mdstarts atPhase 0.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions