Please click the thumbs-up emoji if you use the fluent-api plugin as a way of performing a census.
Functional programming is raising in popularity w/ Java and unfortunately, it uses the 'with' prefix on methods vs 'set'. Also, feels like Functional programming is out-pacing Fluent and we support Functional long term.
Functional differs as the copy() method would be called on each withX() invocation to ensure a fresh instance is used and maintain immutability-like behavior.
The problem is that both styles use the 'withX(X x)' prefix, but behavior is very different.
-
Do we provide the ability to set the method prefix for fluent-api to something else going forward?
-
If we add a Functional plugin, do we detect if fluent is also used and error out b/c both can't be used together?
Please click the thumbs-up emoji if you use the fluent-api plugin as a way of performing a census.
Functional programming is raising in popularity w/ Java and unfortunately, it uses the 'with' prefix on methods vs 'set'. Also, feels like Functional programming is out-pacing Fluent and we support Functional long term.
Functional differs as the copy() method would be called on each withX() invocation to ensure a fresh instance is used and maintain immutability-like behavior.
The problem is that both styles use the 'withX(X x)' prefix, but behavior is very different.
Do we provide the ability to set the method prefix for fluent-api to something else going forward?
If we add a Functional plugin, do we detect if fluent is also used and error out b/c both can't be used together?