Pgbouncer without pgxpool #2299
grandegoiania
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
No. Each pgx.Conn still represents a single connection to pgbouncer. pgxpool is still necessary. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Since I already have a pgbouncer, would it be possible to directly use this external pooler without using pgxpool? for example, if the number of open connections is configured in pgbouncer, could each "conn.QueryRow" use concurrent connections from pgbouncer?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions