Skip to content

Conversation

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Aug 4, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from stmcginnis August 4, 2025 19:20
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

should be safe ™️

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 4, 2025
@stmcginnis
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve
/hold

Go ahead with unfreeze when comfortable. ;)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 4, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 4, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, stmcginnis

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [BenTheElder,stmcginnis]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

I guess let's roll this in a few PRs since there's no rush, we can let the automated build push the base image next

mostly just picking up some "easy" "safe" updates ahead of our next release (at the very least I want to align one to k8s 1.34)

/hold cancel

thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 4, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@BenTheElder: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kind-e2e-kubernetes-1-29 3857d78 link true /test pull-kind-e2e-kubernetes-1-29
pull-kind-e2e-kubernetes-1-30 3857d78 link true /test pull-kind-e2e-kubernetes-1-30
pull-kind-e2e-kubernetes-1-28 3857d78 link true /test pull-kind-e2e-kubernetes-1-28

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

those are expected, we're going to have to patch the CI and/or drop them, it is kubernetes/kubernetes#133261

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

will look at the 1.28..1.29 CI in a bit

@BenTheElder BenTheElder merged commit f552f36 into kubernetes-sigs:main Aug 4, 2025
27 of 31 checks passed
@BenTheElder BenTheElder deleted the bump-deps-again branch August 4, 2025 21:00
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

wednesday is also the 1.34 branch cut, it would be a good time to rotate the CI jobs and make sure we stand up the 1.34 jobs for this repo

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

the postsubmit didn't run? https://prow.k8s.io/?repo=kubernetes-sigs%2Fkind&type=postsubmit

@aojea
Copy link
Contributor

aojea commented Aug 17, 2025

I'm having issues with containerd version 2.1.1 having segfaults, I'm seeing this in kube-network-policies CI that createas a bunch of pods with multiple containers inside very quickly

Aug 13 21:16:32 kind-worker containerd[111]: time="2025-08-13T21:16:32.109203046Z" level=info msg="starting containerd" revision=cb1076646aa3740577fafbf3d914198b7fe8e3f7 version=v2.1.1
Aug 13 21:18:09 kind-worker systemd[1]: containerd.service: Main process exited, code=dumped, status=11/SEGV
Aug 13 21:18:09 kind-worker systemd[1]: containerd.service: Failed with result 'core-dump'.

If I build containerd from latest in the 2.1 release and 2.1.4 does not have the problem, I need to confirm if is still one containerd versions

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants