Skip to content

Commit 3716544

Browse files
committed
papers
1 parent 0a1157b commit 3716544

File tree

4 files changed

+38
-5
lines changed

4 files changed

+38
-5
lines changed

_bibliography/papers.bib

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ @article{Verheijen2025
99
title = {Artificial Intelligence for Segmentation and Classification in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: an overview of current methods},
1010
author = {Verheijen, E.J.A. and Kapogiannis, T. and Munteh, D. and Chabros, J. and Staring, M. and Smith, T.R. and Vleggeert-Lankamp, C.L.A.},
1111
journal = {European Spine Journal},
12-
volume = {},
13-
pages = {},
14-
month = {},
12+
volume = {34},
13+
pages = {1146 -- 1155},
14+
month = {March},
1515
year = {2025},
1616
pdf = {2025_j_ESJ.pdf},
1717
html = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08672-9},

_bibliography/papers_abstracts.bib

Lines changed: 16 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,19 @@
11

2+
@inproceedings{Gao:2025,
3+
abbr = {},
4+
bibtex_show = {true},
5+
author = {Gao, Ruochen and Mody, Prerak and Rao, Chinmay and Habraken, Steven J. M. and Staring, Marius and Dankers, Frank},
6+
title = {Deep Learning-Based Dose Prediction for Head and Neck Tumors: Influence of Loss Function and Model Architecture},
7+
booktitle = {Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)},
8+
month = {May},
9+
year = {2025},
10+
pdf = {},
11+
html = {},
12+
arxiv = {},
13+
code = {},
14+
abstract = {In recent years, deep learning-based approaches for dose prediction in head and neck cancer treatments have made significant progress. However, the effects of key factors, such as the choice of loss function and model architecture, on the accuracy of dose predictions - evaluated using clinically relevant dosimetric parameters - remain underexplored. This study aims to examine how these factors influence the performance of deep learning dose prediction models, focusing on clinically relevant dosimetric parameters (e.g., V95% and mean dose).},
15+
}
16+
217
@inproceedings{Jabarimani:2025a,
318
abbr = {},
419
bibtex_show = {true},
@@ -11,8 +26,7 @@ @inproceedings{Jabarimani:2025a
1126
html = {},
1227
arxiv = {},
1328
code = {},
14-
abstract = {Mid field MR scanners (0.1T-1T) are gaining increasing attention in the last few years (Lavrova et al. (2024), (Campbell Washburn et al., 2019) due to increased safety and lower manufacturing and maintenance cost and consequently improving the accessibility of MRI for clinical purposes (Arnold et al.,
15-
2023). The reduced field strength leads to a reduced signal and change in T1 relaxation times and therefore different contrast and signal to noise as 1.5T and 3T systems.<br>MRI is often used for diagnosing and monitoring brain tumors, lesions, and disorders such as neurodegenerative diseases. Especially for the last afflictions gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volume are interesting markers due to the atrophy associated with these diseases. Automatic segmentation models including Adaptive Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) segmentation (Rajapakse et al., 1997) and partial volume estimation (PVE) (Tohka et al., 2004) are well established models that are used by applications such as CAT12 to estimate GM and WM volumes.<br>In this work we study the quality of T1 weighted based brain segmentations at 0.6T in the context of brain volume measurements in healthy volunteers. We compare segmentations from 0.6T and 1.5T and study how noise suppression by deep learning based reconstruction as provided by the vendor might affect these.},
29+
abstract = {Mid field MR scanners (0.1T-1T) are gaining increasing attention in the last few years (Lavrova et al. (2024), (Campbell Washburn et al., 2019) due to increased safety and lower manufacturing and maintenance cost and consequently improving the accessibility of MRI for clinical purposes (Arnold et al., 2023). The reduced field strength leads to a reduced signal and change in T1 relaxation times and therefore different contrast and signal to noise as 1.5T and 3T systems.<br>MRI is often used for diagnosing and monitoring brain tumors, lesions, and disorders such as neurodegenerative diseases. Especially for the last afflictions gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volume are interesting markers due to the atrophy associated with these diseases. Automatic segmentation models including Adaptive Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) segmentation (Rajapakse et al., 1997) and partial volume estimation (PVE) (Tohka et al., 2004) are well established models that are used by applications such as CAT12 to estimate GM and WM volumes.<br>In this work we study the quality of T1 weighted based brain segmentations at 0.6T in the context of brain volume measurements in healthy volunteers. We compare segmentations from 0.6T and 1.5T and study how noise suppression by deep learning based reconstruction as provided by the vendor might affect these.},
1630
}
1731

1832
@inproceedings{Jabarimani:2025b,

_bibliography/papers_conf.bib

Lines changed: 19 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -3,6 +3,25 @@
33
44
@string{aps = {American Physical Society,}}
55
6+
@inproceedings{Gao:2025,
7+
abbr = {},
8+
bibtex_show = {true},
9+
author = {Gao, Ruochen and Lyu, Donghang and Staring, Marius},
10+
title = {Swin-LiteMedSAM: A Lightweight Box-Based Segment Anything Model for Large-Scale Medical Image Datasets},
11+
booktitle = {Medical Image Segmentation Foundation Models. CVPR 2024 Challenge: Segment Anything in Medical Images on Laptop},
12+
address = {},
13+
series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
14+
volume = {15458},
15+
pages = {70 -- 82},
16+
month = {},
17+
year = {2025},
18+
pdf = {2025_c_CVPR.pdf},
19+
html = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81854-7_5},
20+
arxiv = {2409.07172},
21+
code = {},
22+
abstract = {Medical imaging is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases, with medical image segmentation as a subtask receiving high attention. However, automatic medical image segmentation models are typically task-specific and struggle to handle multiple scenarios, such as different imaging modalities and regions of interest. With the introduction of the Segment Anything Model (SAM), training a universal model for various clinical scenarios has become feasible. Recently, several Medical SAM (MedSAM) methods have been proposed, but these models often rely on heavy image encoders to achieve high performance, which may not be practical for real-world applications due to their high computational demands and slow inference speed. To address this issue, a lightweight version of the MedSAM (LiteMedSAM) can provide a viable solution, achieving high performance while requiring fewer resources and less time. In this work, we introduce Swin-LiteMedSAM, a new variant of LiteMedSAM. This model integrates the tiny Swin Transformer as the image encoder, incorporates multiple types of prompts, including box-based points and scribble generated from a given bounding box, and establishes skip connections between the image encoder and the mask decoder. In the <i>Segment Anything in Medical Images on Laptop</i> challenge (CVPR 2024), our approach strikes a good balance between segmentation performance and speed, demonstrating significantly improved overall results across multiple modalities compared to the LiteMedSAM baseline provided by the challenge organizers. Our proposed model achieved a DSC score of 0.8678 and an NSD score of 0.8844 on the validation set. On the final test set, it attained a DSC score of 0.8193 and an NSD score of 0.8461, securing fourth place in the challenge. The code and trained model are available at https://github.com/RuochenGao/Swin_LiteMedSAM.},
23+
}
24+
625
@inproceedings{Lyu:2024,
726
abbr = {},
827
bibtex_show = {true},

assets/pdf/2025_c_CVPR.pdf

2.3 MB
Binary file not shown.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)