Change tests that expect smirnoff99Frosst ffs to not expect them (#2109)

* change tests that expect s99F ffs to not expect them

* remove s99f from test files

* update releasenotes

Author: j-wags

devtools/conda-envs/openeye-examples.yaml

@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ dependencies:
   - python-constraint
   - openmm >=7.6
   - openff-forcefields >=2023.11
-  - smirnoff99Frosst
   - openff-amber-ff-ports >=0.0.3
   - openff-units
   - openff-utilities >=0.1.5

devtools/conda-envs/openeye.yaml

@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ dependencies:
   - python-constraint
   - openmm >=7.6
   - openff-forcefields >=2023.05.1
-  - smirnoff99Frosst
   - openff-units
   - openff-amber-ff-ports
   - openff-utilities >=0.1.5

devtools/conda-envs/rdkit-examples.yaml

@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ dependencies:
   - python-constraint
   - openmm >=7.6
   - openff-forcefields >=2023.11
-  - smirnoff99Frosst
   - openff-amber-ff-ports >=0.0.3
   - openff-units
   - openff-utilities >=0.1.5

devtools/conda-envs/rdkit.yaml

@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ dependencies:
   - python-constraint
   - openmm >=7.6
   - openff-forcefields >=2023.05.1
-  - smirnoff99Frosst
   - openff-units
   - openff-amber-ff-ports
   - openff-utilities >=0.1.5

devtools/conda-envs/test_env.yaml

@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ dependencies:
   - python-constraint
   - openmm >=7.6
   - openff-forcefields >=2023.05.1
-  - smirnoff99Frosst
   - openff-units
   - openff-amber-ff-ports
   - openff-utilities >=0.1.5

docs/releasehistory.md

@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ Releases follow the `major.minor.micro` scheme recommended by [PEP440](https://w
 
 ### Bugfixes
 - [PR #2107](https://github.com/openforcefield/openff-toolkit/pull/2107): Fixes [Issue #2093](https://github.com/openforcefield/openff-toolkit/issues/2093), where in rare cases `Topology.from_pdb` would mangle the order/coordinates of loaded atoms, by making it raise a `PDBMoleculeHasNoncontiguousAtomIndicesError` instead. 
+- [PR #2109](https://github.com/openforcefield/openff-toolkit/pull/2109): Fixes [Issue #2108](https://github.com/openforcefield/openff-toolkit/issues/2108) by updating tests to reflect that smirnoff99Frosst is no longer installed as a dependency of the OpenFF Toolkit. 
 
 
 ### New features

openff/toolkit/_tests/test_forcefield.py

@@ -782,8 +782,6 @@ def test_get_available_force_fields(self):
 
         # Incomplete list of some expected force fields
         expected_force_fields = [
-            "smirnoff99Frosst-1.0.0.offxml",
-            "smirnoff99Frosst-1.1.0.offxml",
             "openff-1.0.0.offxml",
             "openff_unconstrained-1.0.0.offxml",
             "openff-1.3.0.offxml",
@@ -809,8 +807,8 @@ def test_get_available_force_fields_loadable(self, full_path, force_field_file):
 
     def test_force_field_case(self):
         """Ensure forcefield paths are loaded in a case-insensitive manner"""
-        default_case = ForceField("smirnoff99Frosst-1.1.0.offxml")
-        lower_case = ForceField("smirnoff99frosst-1.1.0.offxml")
+        default_case = ForceField("openff-2.0.0.offxml")
+        lower_case = ForceField("oPeNFF-2.0.0.offxml")
 
         assert hash(default_case) == hash(lower_case)