If a collection has a 'useAsTitle' property configured, use this in the validation of relationship filter options #14564
ollieabbey
started this conversation in
Feature Requests & Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I think this would be a nice UX improvement bringing more meaningful info for end users. One thing I would check for is that it uses a fallback to the original id when a user doesn't have access to the relatedTo/field. Similarly for deleted documents or when a collection doesn't have a useAsTitle. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Example screenshot:
The collection backing 'News Topics' has a 'useAsTitle' field (the value you can see in the screenshot), but when validated against the filter options, it shows the IDs rather than this field in the message.
As a user it would be easier to know which choices are invalid if the useAsTitle field was shown here instead.
Code around here.
I'm happy to try and make this change if you'd like as a first issue.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions