Repository navigation
[Feature]: Group threads by worktree #6751
jakeleventhal
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments
|
Hi @jakeleventhal , did you find any workarounds? Coming from Conductor, this is the feature I miss the most |
0 replies
|
Yeah, I'm also coming from paseo and conductor based approach where they have agent tabs @juliusmarminge I feel like t3code is better with it's sidebar but sometime i also creates the multiple sessions in same worktree or main checkout, some for just side chats back and forth questions some for reviewing opus's work along with gpt 6.1 sol, so it would be really better if sidebar itself has grouping or filtering mechanism, maybe a button over here or in the bottom
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
My Reasoning/Justification
https://cap.so/s/dvaz19nmrwjh2ja
Before submitting
Area
apps/desktop
Problem or use case
The work we do is grouped and managed within a single worktree. Threads should be too.
Consider 4 parallel worktrees where each is a unique branch. It should be easy to organize threads to be grouped by the overarching worktree. Grouping primarily by repo is the wrong organizing principle especially since most people are not using multiple repos anyway.
Conductor does a good job of this and has the best capture on the mental model of how people actually work. T3 Code should adopt this approach.
Proposed solution
The primary grouping of threads is by worktree, like Conductor.
Why this matters
It's hard to keep track of multiple worktrees that have multiple threads each.
Smallest useful scope
See above
Alternatives considered
No response
Risks or tradeoffs
No response
Examples or references
Exactly how Conductor works.
Contribution
All reactions