Skip to content

Conversation

@gruuya
Copy link
Contributor

@gruuya gruuya commented Jan 26, 2024

Closes #491

@gruuya gruuya requested a review from mildbyte January 26, 2024 14:46
@gruuya gruuya force-pushed the add-arm64-linux-builds branch from 8719316 to c464b6a Compare February 1, 2024 14:33
@gruuya gruuya force-pushed the add-arm64-linux-builds branch from c464b6a to c9fd609 Compare February 1, 2024 14:37
@onpaws
Copy link
Contributor

onpaws commented Feb 1, 2024

I don't have a lot of context, apologies if we already decided this isn't possible.
A single GHA runner seems appealing for simplicity, so assuming that single runner has to stay x86 based, I wonder if running the ARM binary inside qemu could help us do a basic 'did it run' test 🤔

@gruuya
Copy link
Contributor Author

gruuya commented Feb 2, 2024

I wonder if running the ARM binary inside qemu could help us do a basic 'did it run' test

That's an interesting suggestion, thanks. Nonetheless, it seems simpler to wait for GH to release the linux arm64 image so that we can use that directly (otherwise I'm not sure how complicated/portable the build would get).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat: arm64 builds

3 participants