While implementing validation for Represents I noticed that the requirement for a computed value of Represents on Script Event and Text objects is unclear. The wording under Script Event and Text is slightly different, and it is not obvious why.

It also is unclear if it is acceptable to have a <span> that sets daptm:represents="" if its ancestor <p> has a computed value of daptm:represents that is valid.

Suggest tidying the language to make this less ambiguous:

• Clarify that every part of a Text must have a valid computed Represents
• Clarify that Script Events and Text objects must have a valid computed Represents
• Clarify that <div> elements that are not Script Events don't need a valid computed Represents

It might be useful to specify in §4.7 Represents which objects the property applies to, as well as which is may be specified on, which is listed now.