Skip to content

Revise language around dependent claims #1617

@msporny

Description

@msporny

Some people are getting confused by the language in Section 9.6 around atomic claims:

https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/#bundling-dependent-claims

The confusion seems to be around us suggesting that atomic claims are a best practice, which they are no longer since we have standardized selective disclosure and unlinkable disclosure schemes.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    class 2ready for PRThis issue is ready for a Pull Request to be created to resolve it

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions