Skip to content

chore(deps): update module github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go to v1.2.1 [security] (alauda-v0.34.0) - #184

Open
alaudaa-renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
alauda-v0.34.0from
renovate/alauda-v0.34.0-go-github.com-sigstore-sigstore-go-vulnerability
Open

chore(deps): update module github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go to v1.2.1 [security] (alauda-v0.34.0)#184
alaudaa-renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
alauda-v0.34.0from
renovate/alauda-v0.34.0-go-github.com-sigstore-sigstore-go-vulnerability

Conversation

@alaudaa-renovate

@alaudaa-renovate alaudaa-renovate Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go v1.1.4 -> v1.2.1 age confidence

sigstore-go has a multi-log threshold bypass via single compromised log in github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go

CVE-2026-49834 / GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6 / GO-2026-5952

More information

Details

sigstore-go has a multi-log threshold bypass via single compromised log in github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go

Severity

Unknown

References

This data is provided by OSV and the Go Vulnerability Database (CC-BY 4.0).


sigstore-go has a multi-log threshold bypass via single compromised log

CVE-2026-49834 / GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6 / GO-2026-5952

More information

Details

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

A verifier configured with WithTransparencyLog(N>1) or WithSignedCertificateTimestamps(N>1) expected defense-in-depth against the compromise of a single log instance. However, threshold counting counted verified witnesses per-entry or per-validation-path rather than per-log-authority.

As a result, a single compromised transparency log could forge multiple entries with different indices, and a single compromised CT log could verify multiple times (either across multiple certificate chains or via multiple embedded SCTs), fully satisfying the multi-log threshold requirements and defeating the multi-log policy.

Note that this does not affect Cosign, as Cosign sets a threshold of 1.

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

Upgrade to v1.1.5.

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

There is no workaround, beyond relying on trusted logs.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 5.9 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

References

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


sigstore-go fails to check signature timestamps against a signing key's validity period in github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go

CVE-2026-54787 / GHSA-wqqc-jjcq-vfxm / GO-2026-6162

More information

Details

sigstore-go fails to check signature timestamps against a signing key's validity period in github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go

Severity

Unknown

References

This data is provided by OSV and the Go Vulnerability Database (CC-BY 4.0).


sigstore-go fails to check signature timestamps against a signing key's validity period

CVE-2026-54787 / GHSA-wqqc-jjcq-vfxm / GO-2026-6162

More information

Details

sigstore-go fails to check signature timestamps against a signing key's validity period for self-managed long-lived keys without certificates.

Impact

To verify a bundle with a self-managed long-lived key, the key needs to be wrapped in an ExpiringKey type that implies expiration semantics:

signatureVerifier, _ := signature.LoadDefaultVerifier(publicKey)
expiredKey := root.NewExpiringKey(signatureVerifier, time.Unix(0, 0), time.Unix(1, 0))

Despite the API contract, the validator does not check the bundle signing time against the validity window. Attackers that obtain expired key materials may be able to sign bundles with those materials that are accepted despite a configured expiry date. This issue only impacts the long-lived signing key workflow, and not standard deployments involving a certificate authority.

Reproduction steps

Start from a sigstore-go checkout:

git clone https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go.git
cd sigstore-go
git checkout 8ca80c47ef03d26ebf174db7c296700b075b2c16

Apply the patch containing the test case and associated materials:

git apply sigstore-go-public-key-validity-test.patch

Run the test:

go test ./pkg/verify -run TestPublicKeyValidityCheckedAgainstSignedTimestamp

On vulnerable code, the test fails because verification succeeds even though the trusted ExpiringKey is not valid at the signed timestamp:

--- FAIL: TestPublicKeyValidityCheckedAgainstSignedTimestamp
    signed_entity_test.go:602:
        	Error:      	An error is expected but got nil.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 3.1 / 10 (Low)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

sigstore/sigstore-go (github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go)

v1.2.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

v1.2.1 resolves GHSA-wqqc-jjcq-vfxm.

Full Changelog: sigstore/sigstore-go@v1.2.0...v1.2.1

v1.2.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: sigstore/sigstore-go@v1.1.4...v1.2.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" in timezone Asia/Shanghai, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@alaudaa-renovate

alaudaa-renovate Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: go.sum
Command failed: go get -d -t ./...
go: -d flag is deprecated. -d=true is a no-op
go: github.com/tektoncd/cli/pkg/chain imports
	github.com/tektoncd/chains/pkg/chains/storage imports
	github.com/tektoncd/chains/pkg/chains/storage/docdb imports
	gocloud.dev/docstore/awsdynamodb: cannot find module providing package gocloud.dev/docstore/awsdynamodb

@alaudaa-renovate
alaudaa-renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/alauda-v0.34.0-go-github.com-sigstore-sigstore-go-vulnerability branch from 56ffae4 to 3b1b2eb Compare August 8, 2026 10:56
@alaudaa-renovate alaudaa-renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update module github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go to v1.2.0 [security] (alauda-v0.34.0) chore(deps): update module github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go to v1.2.1 [security] (alauda-v0.34.0) Aug 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant