OCP 7.9

[adam-urbanczyk]

Updates for OCP 7.9 compatibility.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 96.07%. Comparing base (6cd5eeb) to head (0c7f4e7).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
cadquery/occ_impl/shapes.py	66.66%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1946   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.07%   96.07%           
=======================================
  Files          29       29           
  Lines        7956     7956           
  Branches     1190     1190           
=======================================
  Hits         7644     7644           
  Misses        179      179           
  Partials      133      133           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[adam-urbanczyk]

Despite my fix 7.9 fails on cqgi and python 14. Seems to work on earlier ones.

[Oblynx]

Hey @adam-urbanczyk I just tested this on our internal test suite, which isn't using OCP 7.9-specific features. The upgrade went well and all the tests passed. Python 3.11.

[adam-urbanczyk]

Thanks @Oblynx , the remaining issue is 3.14 and cqgi specific.

BTW: would you be willing to describe your use case?

[Oblynx]

We are using cadquery as a lightweight and LLM friendly CAD scripting language in our engineering platform 🫶

[greyltc]

Despite my fix 7.9 fails on cqgi and python 14. Seems to work on earlier ones.

@adam-urbanczyk maybe that cqgi failure is this: #1976 nevermind, I didn't see fc85e1d!