Summary
Implement Separate dependency readiness from liveness health checks as a production-ready improvement in this repository.
Why this matters
Operators need bounded behavior, truthful telemetry, and a safe recovery path when dependencies or workers fail.
Scope
Trace the affected public entry point through persistence, external dependencies, and user/operator-visible output. Implement Separate dependency readiness from liveness health checks without weakening existing authorization, correctness, compatibility, or CI safeguards.
Priority
High
Acceptance criteria
Validation
The PR must include focused regression coverage for this issue, including:
- Normal, degraded, and recovery states are explicit and bounded.
- Metrics and diagnostics are actionable, cardinality-bounded, and safe.
- Recovery preserves durable state without duplicate work or hidden mutation.
Run the repository’s standard formatting, lint, build, and test commands where applicable, and report unrelated pre-existing failures separately.
Non-goals
- Typo-only, formatting-only, or documentation-only changes.
- Unrelated refactors, dependency upgrades, or broad redesigns.
- Weakening security, authorization, CI, validation, or production safeguards.
- Changing public behavior outside this issue’s scope.
Contributor application
Before implementation, comment with relevant experience, a concise implementation approach, expected files or modules, and an estimate for opening the first PR. Wait for maintainer assignment before coding.
PR requirements
Use a feature branch and include Closes #<issue-number>. The PR must address every acceptance criterion, link each criterion to code and tests, explain security and failure-mode handling, include meaningful regression coverage, preserve compatibility, and report validation results.
Quality review
This is a substantive engineering issue. Review will consider correctness, security, failure handling, test quality, scope discipline, and maintainability.
Summary
Implement Separate dependency readiness from liveness health checks as a production-ready improvement in this repository.
Why this matters
Operators need bounded behavior, truthful telemetry, and a safe recovery path when dependencies or workers fail.
Scope
Trace the affected public entry point through persistence, external dependencies, and user/operator-visible output. Implement Separate dependency readiness from liveness health checks without weakening existing authorization, correctness, compatibility, or CI safeguards.
Priority
High
Acceptance criteria
Validation
The PR must include focused regression coverage for this issue, including:
Run the repository’s standard formatting, lint, build, and test commands where applicable, and report unrelated pre-existing failures separately.
Non-goals
Contributor application
Before implementation, comment with relevant experience, a concise implementation approach, expected files or modules, and an estimate for opening the first PR. Wait for maintainer assignment before coding.
PR requirements
Use a feature branch and include
Closes #<issue-number>. The PR must address every acceptance criterion, link each criterion to code and tests, explain security and failure-mode handling, include meaningful regression coverage, preserve compatibility, and report validation results.Quality review
This is a substantive engineering issue. Review will consider correctness, security, failure handling, test quality, scope discipline, and maintainability.