Skip to content

Conversation

@jandro996
Copy link
Member

Motivation

Changes

Workflow

  1. ⚠️ Create your PR as draft ⚠️
  2. Work on you PR until the CI passes
  3. Mark it as ready for review
    • Test logic is modified? -> Get a review from RFC owner.
    • Framework is modified, or non obvious usage of it -> get a review from R&P team

🚀 Once your PR is reviewed and the CI green, you can merge it!

🛟 #apm-shared-testing 🛟

Reviewer checklist

  • If PR title starts with [<language>], double-check that only <language> is impacted by the change
  • No system-tests internal is modified. Otherwise, I have the approval from R&P team
  • A docker base image is modified?
    • the relevant build-XXX-image label is present
  • A scenario is added (or removed)?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 15, 2025

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

manifests/java.yml                                                      @DataDog/asm-java @DataDog/apm-java
utils/scripts/load-binary.sh                                            @DataDog/system-tests-core

@jandro996 jandro996 changed the title [Java][[email protected]/security-response-id] enable security response id tests [[email protected]/security-response-id] enable security response id tests Dec 15, 2025
@jandro996 jandro996 changed the title [[email protected]/security-response-id] enable security response id tests [[email protected]/security-response-id] enable security response id test Dec 15, 2025
@jandro996 jandro996 changed the title [[email protected]/security-response-id] enable security response id test [Java] enable security response id test Dec 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants