You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Latest owner direction supersedes the earlier 25k/two-second milestone: target close performance to the existing tiny- benchmarks, reject quadratic scaling, and defer the 25,000-file and million-file cases.* #130 remains promoted into the active migration; it does not wait for #124/#125 closure.
The current implementation plan governs the selected architecture, iteration order, comparison and acceptance. This is reviewed planning, not implemented performance. The former 25k case registration and two-second gate are deferred. Million-file qualification remains DEFERRED/OPEN wherever the broader migration requires it; this does not waive or satisfy that obligation.
Successor execution prompt
Use the published execution handoff to implement and verify the full current P130 rollout. It requires actual package-completion comments, five tier-500 cases then all 20 when stable, retained failure/pass validity, reviewed main delivery and verified terminal #130 closure. No stop at a replan, revision, one green case or subagent completion while ready authorized work remains. Genuine external blocks remain explicit and never become PASS.
The owner also prohibits patching, forking, vendoring, replacing or copying/reimplementing third-party libraries/imported implementations, and changing third-party dependency/import declarations to bypass an API limitation. Use existing documented APIs and first-party code; no dependency forks/overrides/new packages/version changes. See the handoff's precise boundary and external-block handling.
Quick iteration: exactly five tier-500 cases
Case
Actual workload
tiny-create-500-mixed-v4
500 created tiny files with the registered mixed background
tiny-stat-500-mixed-v4
500 stat targets with the registered mixed background
tiny-unlink-500-mixed-v4
500 removed tiny files with the registered mixed background
tiny-bulk-create-500-mixed-v3
5,000 created files / 500 MiB plus registered witness
tiny-bulk-delete-500-mixed-v3
5,000 removed files / 500 MiB plus registered witness
The bulk 500 tier does not mean 500 files. Preserve fixtures, byte distributions, metadata normalization, root sync, worker counts, seeds, timers and independent verification. Do not substitute smaller cases, one-byte workloads, SDK bulk operations or the legacy authority route.
Establish results for these five, then iterate on the failing case and genuinely affected regressions only. Reuse valid passes across unrelated edits. When stable, qualify all 20 existing tiny_file_churn cases; the five-case quick screen is not full-family or full #125 completion. All 20 are outside the 36 #122 exclusions.
What “close performance” means
Use a compatible v0.1.5 control and the existing #118 ordinary paired regression screen, prospectively frozen for this evaluation:
Existing n3 fresh alternating pairs, retaining its arm/seed/custody rules.
A material wall regression requires median paired slowdown > max(15% of control median, 3 ms) AND at least two of three pairs slower.
CPU analogue: max(15% of control median, 1 ms).
Stronger applicable criteria prevail, including registered strict <1 s tier 100 bulk create/delete and tiny-create-100 criteria where applicable. Correctness/resource/cleanup/deadline failures cannot be excused by a relative screen.
Apply the screen to each registered whole-workflow metric; receipt operations=1 must not be divided by 500/5,000 files to dilute the noise floor. Preserve the inherited pure_call_sum, and report Begin/Exec/Commit/visibility/End and orchestration wall separately. No universal two-second target or new per-file threshold.
Historical tiny-create-500 measured 242.659707 ms for 500 files / 824,450 B on a 5,000-file/ 500 MiB background; bulk-create-500 measured 5,732.993668 ms for 5,000 files/ 500 MiB, including large files. Those are context until a matched control is established. If compatible public execution cannot be established, comparison is unavailable/blocked, not “close” from unlike routes. Preserve historical WARN/FAIL/waiver/reuse labels.
Implement overhead reduction: local payload reclamation, bounded Index preparation, measured compact storage/correspondence/lifecycle/transport changes, and their five/20-case tiny-churn comparisons and affected correctness checks
Later full included benchmark campaign, final matrix/custody/report and its terminal requirements
Promoting #130 means implementing its own changes now alongside #124. It does not rename #124's unfinished integration or make complete #124 success a prerequisite for the first optimization. Authentic public timing depends on the verified new route; independent allocator/Index/range/correspondence work can start immediately with owned inputs. The interrupted four-file #124 patch remains separate.
First #130 implementation slice: reproduce and repair quadratic arena reclamation, then remove redundant Index/range preparation. Comparator/instrumentation work supports these code changes; it does not replace them.
Two subagents reviewed existing tiny-churn receipts/registry and actual write/Index/payload/transport source, then reassessed the plan for this revised scope. The coordinating review checked governing contracts.
P130.2 — Repair quadratic reclamation and redundant preparation. Current release-triggered whole-arena evacuation can move N+(N−1)+… live blocks across small deletions with completed maintenance: quadratic cumulative work. Replace it with indexed free-space reuse/local tail-block reclamation and an amortized proof. Prepare bounded final operation records instead of repeatedly constructing/retiring intermediate Index roots.
P130.3 — Select the next measured storage cost. Use denser existing Index pages, Empty/Single/Indexed ranges, packed tiny allocation in existing arenas or metadata-only singleton correspondence only where the case measurements justify it. The full compact-storage bundle is not a prerequisite for the first useful result.
P130.4 — Remove measured remaining latency. Lazy unused resources, bounded immutable-page cache or a correct transport change are conditional. Serialized host requests are an independent cost; preserve host ownership before acknowledgment and exact replay. No mandatory RAM-first pager or replacement backend.
No quadratic scaling is acceptable, including deferred maintenance. Linear necessary input/output processing is allowed; prefer logarithmic point/index operations and O(1) snapshot ownership. D logarithmic updates may total O(D log N); disclose those factors. Fixed-size maintenance calls are not proof of bounded cumulative work.
Required guards
Keep the single host authority, immutable published metadata, exact leased-source installation, independent file/snapshot ownership, bounded journals/admission and existing canonical construction/CAS/authentication/FULL-DELTA/CDC/extents/packing/compression/staging/publication machinery. A file-only reader must not retain unrelated payload tokens through a shared leaf. Packed physical slack remains bounded and charged; preserve append/Origin/promotion, fsync, relocation, rollback and release headroom.
V1 dirty-writable-mapping visibility is still open. No host-root-only full-surface claim, implicit user fsync, removed mmap, third-party patch, global freeze/drain, remount or checkpoint reset is authorized. Live operations/handles must survive Commit and retained stages; C1/C2 and lost Created/UpToDate resolution stay exact. Preserve original failures and the interrupted unverified Step 5 patch rather than claiming it passed.
Acceptance and execution discipline
Verify/freeze the five exact quick cases, comparator, existing criteria and actual new production dispatch.
Repair quadratic cumulative reclamation with focused source-bound proof and affected regressions.
Remove measured redundant work; select and version additional representation changes only for demonstrated costs.
Achieve close per-case performance under the existing screen and all stronger applicable criteria; no required failure hidden by a family average or inner Commit time.
Qualify all 20 inherited tiny-churn cases when stable, preserving exact fixtures, seeds/repetitions, independent proofs and cleanup.
Publish real time, CPU/RSS/cgroup, metadata/payload/index/retained/scratch/slack storage and I/O. Unavailable is not zero; earlier 105–245 MiB estimates are not accepted per-call allowances.
Preserve affected natural-overlap, C1/C2, large-file and supported FUSE/SDK checks. Keep existing 100k-base D=0/1/10 and 100k-changed accounting obligations explicit; neither is a quick-iteration prerequisite or a substitute for deferred million-file qualification.
Retain 25k/two-second and million-file cases as deferred, neither passed nor waived. Do not register/run them in this evaluation.
Post a substantive source/evidence/failures/reused-passes/next-action comment after each actual P130 completion; mirror production/correctness to #124 and benchmark-facing changes to #125. Original seven-phase completion comments remain required. During implementation, bounded subagents iterate on concrete checks and integrate results; no stop at a revision or one green test while ready authorized work remains. Reuse valid passes and existing facilities. Do not rerun the whole five- or 20-case set after unrelated fixes.
Use the existing runner and measurement lock. macOS owns Store/SDK/coordinator/construction/spool; Linux Docker owns daemon/FUSE/workload under existing 2 CPU / 2 GiB / no-swap / 256 PID limits. No concurrent resource-sensitive work. All 36 #122 cases (33 regular + 3 extended) remain excluded; no shared/v016_matrix.py campaign, release/tag, website deployment or #123 closure.
Promoted migration: existing tiny-churn evaluation
Latest owner direction supersedes the earlier 25k/two-second milestone: target close performance to the existing tiny- benchmarks, reject quadratic scaling, and defer the 25,000-file and million-file cases.* #130 remains promoted into the active migration; it does not wait for #124/#125 closure.
The current implementation plan governs the selected architecture, iteration order, comparison and acceptance. This is reviewed planning, not implemented performance. The former 25k case registration and two-second gate are deferred. Million-file qualification remains DEFERRED/OPEN wherever the broader migration requires it; this does not waive or satisfy that obligation.
Successor execution prompt
Use the published execution handoff to implement and verify the full current P130 rollout. It requires actual package-completion comments, five tier-500 cases then all 20 when stable, retained failure/pass validity, reviewed main delivery and verified terminal #130 closure. No stop at a replan, revision, one green case or subagent completion while ready authorized work remains. Genuine external blocks remain explicit and never become PASS.
The owner also prohibits patching, forking, vendoring, replacing or copying/reimplementing third-party libraries/imported implementations, and changing third-party dependency/import declarations to bypass an API limitation. Use existing documented APIs and first-party code; no dependency forks/overrides/new packages/version changes. See the handoff's precise boundary and external-block handling.
Quick iteration: exactly five tier-500 cases
The bulk 500 tier does not mean 500 files. Preserve fixtures, byte distributions, metadata normalization, root sync, worker counts, seeds, timers and independent verification. Do not substitute smaller cases, one-byte workloads, SDK bulk operations or the legacy authority route.
Establish results for these five, then iterate on the failing case and genuinely affected regressions only. Reuse valid passes across unrelated edits. When stable, qualify all 20 existing tiny_file_churn cases; the five-case quick screen is not full-family or full #125 completion. All 20 are outside the 36 #122 exclusions.
What “close performance” means
Use a compatible v0.1.5 control and the existing #118 ordinary paired regression screen, prospectively frozen for this evaluation:
Apply the screen to each registered whole-workflow metric; receipt operations=1 must not be divided by 500/5,000 files to dilute the noise floor. Preserve the inherited pure_call_sum, and report Begin/Exec/Commit/visibility/End and orchestration wall separately. No universal two-second target or new per-file threshold.
Historical tiny-create-500 measured 242.659707 ms for 500 files / 824,450 B on a 5,000-file/ 500 MiB background; bulk-create-500 measured 5,732.993668 ms for 5,000 files/ 500 MiB, including large files. Those are context until a matched control is established. If compatible public execution cannot be established, comparison is unavailable/blocked, not “close” from unlike routes. Preserve historical WARN/FAIL/waiver/reuse labels.
Explicit issue ownership
Promoting #130 means implementing its own changes now alongside #124. It does not rename #124's unfinished integration or make complete #124 success a prerequisite for the first optimization. Authentic public timing depends on the verified new route; independent allocator/Index/range/correspondence work can start immediately with owned inputs. The interrupted four-file #124 patch remains separate.
First #130 implementation slice: reproduce and repair quadratic arena reclamation, then remove redundant Index/range preparation. Comparator/instrumentation work supports these code changes; it does not replace them.
Architecture review and #130 implementation order
Two subagents reviewed existing tiny-churn receipts/registry and actual write/Index/payload/transport source, then reassessed the plan for this revised scope. The coordinating review checked governing contracts.
No quadratic scaling is acceptable, including deferred maintenance. Linear necessary input/output processing is allowed; prefer logarithmic point/index operations and O(1) snapshot ownership. D logarithmic updates may total O(D log N); disclose those factors. Fixed-size maintenance calls are not proof of bounded cumulative work.
Required guards
Keep the single host authority, immutable published metadata, exact leased-source installation, independent file/snapshot ownership, bounded journals/admission and existing canonical construction/CAS/authentication/FULL-DELTA/CDC/extents/packing/compression/staging/publication machinery. A file-only reader must not retain unrelated payload tokens through a shared leaf. Packed physical slack remains bounded and charged; preserve append/Origin/promotion, fsync, relocation, rollback and release headroom.
V1 dirty-writable-mapping visibility is still open. No host-root-only full-surface claim, implicit user fsync, removed mmap, third-party patch, global freeze/drain, remount or checkpoint reset is authorized. Live operations/handles must survive Commit and retained stages; C1/C2 and lost Created/UpToDate resolution stay exact. Preserve original failures and the interrupted unverified Step 5 patch rather than claiming it passed.
Acceptance and execution discipline
Post a substantive source/evidence/failures/reused-passes/next-action comment after each actual P130 completion; mirror production/correctness to #124 and benchmark-facing changes to #125. Original seven-phase completion comments remain required. During implementation, bounded subagents iterate on concrete checks and integrate results; no stop at a revision or one green test while ready authorized work remains. Reuse valid passes and existing facilities. Do not rerun the whole five- or 20-case set after unrelated fixes.
Use the existing runner and measurement lock. macOS owns Store/SDK/coordinator/construction/spool; Linux Docker owns daemon/FUSE/workload under existing 2 CPU / 2 GiB / no-swap / 256 PID limits. No concurrent resource-sensitive work. All 36 #122 cases (33 regular + 3 extended) remain excluded; no shared/v016_matrix.py campaign, release/tag, website deployment or #123 closure.