Skip to content

Conversation

@mike-finopsorg
Copy link
Contributor

Add unittest to ensure no other similar issues found and to keep this happening again
Signed-off-by: Mike Fuller [email protected]

Add unittest to ensure no other similar issues found and to keep this happening again
Signed-off-by: Mike Fuller <[email protected]>
@mike-finopsorg mike-finopsorg self-assigned this Nov 11, 2025
@mike-finopsorg mike-finopsorg requested a review from a team as a code owner November 11, 2025 23:26
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Submitted in FOCUS WG Nov 11, 2025
@shawnalpay shawnalpay moved this from Submitted to PR Member Review in FOCUS WG Nov 13, 2025
@shawnalpay shawnalpay added this to the v1.3 milestone Nov 13, 2025
@jpradocueva
Copy link
Contributor

Approved by the group without objections or abstentions during the November 13 Members’ call.
TO BE MERGED ON DECEMBER 4th AT THE END OF THE IPR REVIEW

@shawnalpay shawnalpay moved this from PR Member Review to PR Approved in FOCUS WG Nov 20, 2025
shawnalpay and others added 4 commits November 20, 2025 16:55
A couple of consistency fixes for the value formats.

---------

Co-authored-by: Joaquin <[email protected]>
This PR addresses minor editorial issues in the FOCUS 1.3, as outlined
in Action Item #1631
We have added a new entry to the Status attribute of the FOCUS WG
project view (`In Evaluation`) to represent the Feature Request Review
process we have introduced to FOCUS 1.4.

This PR updates the documentation for the Status attribute in the
development processes guidelines.

This PR is NOT to be approved and merged as part of 1.3, as it was not
part of that release process. We can approve and merge in any Members
meeting after Nov 6.

---------

Co-authored-by: Joaquin Prado <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Joaquin <[email protected]>
…el-effectivecost-c-004-m-has-incorrectly-defined-requirements
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: PR Approved

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[AI] Fix bug in Requirements Model EffectiveCost-C-004-M has incorrectly defined requirements

5 participants