Point the LENS baseline and README at their canonical URLs

[vassiliphilippov]

github.com/GliteTech/glite-lens does not exist. The Glite LENS row on the leaderboard has been linking to a 404, sitting directly beside three working SapienzaNLP baseline links — on a board whose entire claim is that every number is auditable, the one dead link was on our own model.

LENS lives in research-semcor-relabeling, the reproducibility record for the lexEN/SenseBench paper (public, not archived, pushed 18 July).

The link carries the #glite-lens anchor rather than pointing at the repo root, because that README opens on the relabeled-SemCor tables. This matches how the ESCHER and ConSeC rows land straight on their models.

Verified after the change — all four baseline source_urls resolve:

200  https://github.com/GliteTech/research-semcor-relabeling#glite-lens
200  https://github.com/SapienzaNLP/consec
200  https://github.com/SapienzaNLP/esc
200  https://github.com/SapienzaNLP/wsd-hard-benchmark

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Glite LENS baseline metadata now points to the specific research-semcor-relabeling#glite-lens repository location. The README’s “Live leaderboard” link now points to https://sense-bench.com/. No scoring logic or control flow changed.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• GliteTech/sensebench#204: Updates Glite LENS baseline specifications in the same metadata module.

Suggested reviewers: emilkayumov

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Destructive Migrations	✅ Passed	PASS: The PR only changes README.md and baselines.py; there are no Django migration files or Django indicators in the repo, so this check is not applicable.
Mobile Localization String Quality Review	✅ Passed	Only README.md changed; no files under mobile/ were modified, so there are no mobile strings to review.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description accurately describes the baseline link and README URL updates in the pull request.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}