Skip to content

Escape Perl variable $1 in repair_old_backports to prevent 'unbound v… #1366

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
kuldeepkk-dev wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Escape Perl variable $1 in repair_old_backports to prevent 'unbound v… #1366

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion cloud-sql-proxy/cloud-sql-proxy.sh
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ function repair_old_backports {
for filename in "${matched_files[@]}"; do
# Fetch from archive.debian.org for ${oldoldstable}-backports
perl -pi -e "s{^(deb[^\s]*) https?://[^/]+/debian ${oldoldstable}-backports }
{\$1 https://archive.debian.org/debian ${oldoldstable}-backports }g" "${filename}"
{\\\$1 https://archive.debian.org/debian ${oldoldstable}-backports }g" "${filename}"
Comment on lines 172 to +173
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot Nov 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The use of \\\$1 to escape the Perl back-reference is a valid way to handle nested evaluation by the shell, which seems to be the case in this execution environment. However, this triple-backslash escaping is quite subtle and can be difficult for other developers to understand and maintain.

For improved clarity and long-term maintainability, I recommend refactoring this command to use shell variables. This approach separates the search and replace patterns from the perl command itself, making the quoting much simpler and the overall logic easier to follow.

Here's a suggested alternative:

    local search_pattern="^(deb[^\s]*) https?://[^/]+/debian ${oldoldstable}-backports "
    # The '$1' here is for perl, so it's in single quotes to prevent shell expansion.
    local replace_pattern='$1 https://archive.debian.org/debian '${oldoldstable}'-backports'
    perl -pi -e "s{${search_pattern}}{${replace_pattern}}g" "${filename}"

This would replace the current multi-line perl command and make the script's intent more explicit.

Copy link
Contributor

@cjac cjac Nov 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, this is not true. The LLM is incorrect here. The $1 is already being escaped. I asked duckie to be sure:

You are correct to critically evaluate the analysis provided by the on-the-fly code assist. The explanation regarding \\\$1 appears to be incorrect.

Here's a breakdown of the escaping:

  1. The Goal: Inside the Perl substitution command s{...}{...}, we want to use the content of the first capturing group from the search pattern. In Perl, this is represented by $1 in the replacement section.

  2. Shell Quoting: The entire Perl script s{...}{...} is enclosed in double quotes (") in the shell command. The shell processes strings within double quotes before passing them to the command (in this case, perl).

    • $ has special meaning to the shell (variable expansion).
    • \ has special meaning to the shell (escaping).

  3. How the Shell Interprets Escapes:

    • \$1: The shell sees \$ and replaces it with a literal $. So, Perl receives the string $1. This is the correct way to pass the backreference variable $1 to Perl's replacement string when inside shell double quotes.

    • \\\$1:

      • The first \\ tells the shell to treat the second \ as a literal backslash.
      • The shell then sees \$, which it treats as a literal $.
      • So, the shell transforms \\\$1 into \$1 before passing it to Perl.
      • Perl's s/// operator, in the replacement part, would likely interpret \$1 as a literal dollar sign followed by the digit 1, NOT as the content of the first capture group.

Conclusion on the Analysis:

The statement "The use of \\\$1 to escape the Perl back-reference is a valid way to handle nested evaluation by the shell" is misleading in this context. It does not result in Perl using the value of the backreference; it results in a literal string \$1 being passed to Perl's replacement block, which isn't the intended backreference.

The original code snippet (presumably on line 172, using {\$1) was likely the correct one.

Gemini's Refactoring Suggestion:

The idea to use shell variables to construct the search and replace patterns is excellent for readability and maintainability, as it separates the concerns of shell quoting and Perl regex syntax. This aligns with Google's Shell Style Guide (go/shell-style) on making quoting clear.

However, there's a slight issue in the suggested replace_pattern:

# Gemini's suggestion for replace_pattern:
local replace_pattern='$1 https://archive.debian.org/debian '${oldoldstable}'-backports'

This would not expand the oldoldstable variable correctly because of the single quotes. A corrected version of the refactoring would be:

    local search_pattern="^(deb[^\s]*) https?://[^/]+/debian ${oldoldstable}-backports "
    # Ensure $1 is literal for Perl, and shell variables are expanded.
    local replace_pattern="\$1 https://archive.debian.org/debian ${oldoldstable}-backports"
    # Alternatively, using single quotes for the literal $1 part:
    # local replace_pattern='$1 https://archive.debian.org/debian '"${oldoldstable}"'-backports'

    perl -pi -e "s{${search_pattern}}{${replace_pattern}}g" "${filename}"

In this corrected version:

  • search_pattern has ${oldoldstable} expanded by the shell.
  • replace_pattern uses \$1 so the shell passes the literal $1 to Perl. The shell also expands ${oldoldstable}.
  • The final perl command is much cleaner.

In summary: Your skepticism is well-founded. The triple backslash \\\$1 is not the correct way to represent a Perl backreference in this shell-quoted context. The refactoring approach is good, but the example provided needed a minor quoting correction.

Sources:

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot Nov 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While this change correctly fixes the escaping issue for the $1 backreference, the use of this backreference is the root cause of the escaping complexity and appears to be unnecessary.

The capture group (deb[^\s]*) on the previous line will only ever capture the literal string deb, because the [^\s]* part is followed by a space in the pattern and will match an empty string.

A simpler and more robust solution would be to remove the capture group from the regex on line 172 and replace $1 here with the literal string deb. This would eliminate the need for the complex \\\$ escaping, making the code easier to read and maintain.

Since line 172 is not part of this change, I cannot provide a direct code suggestion, but I recommend applying this simplification in a follow-up.

Copy link
Contributor

@cjac cjac Nov 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not true. /deb[^\s]* / matches both deb and deb-src

The LLM is confused here.

done
}

Expand Down