feat(genai): add tool samples (1)#3277
feat(genai): add tool samples (1)#3277jdomingr wants to merge 3 commits intoGoogleCloudPlatform:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Here is the summary of changes. You are about to add 4 region tags.
This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
|
Summary of ChangesHello @jdomingr, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly expands the GenAI SDK's sample suite by introducing four new examples that illustrate the usage of various powerful tools: code execution, Google Search, URL context, and function calling, all integrated with text-based interactions. These additions aim to provide clearer guidance and practical demonstrations for developers looking to incorporate these advanced AI capabilities into their applications. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces several new samples for GenAI tools. The code is generally well-structured and clear. However, I've identified a recurring pattern of unsafe access to collection elements in the API response handling across multiple files. This could lead to runtime exceptions if the API returns an empty list. I've provided suggestions to use safer methods like FirstOrDefault() with null-conditional operators to improve the robustness of the samples.
Add new tool samples
Code execution with text
Google Search with text
Url context with text
Function calling with text
All local tests have passed