Skip to content

Conversation

@jasonkatonica
Copy link
Member

As mentioned at the bottom of the maven surefire plugin a treeview is available to format the output of our Junit tests as they are executed.

This is setup to suppress any output that is not part of a test that has failed.

The treeview is able to allow easier view of tests that are actually run during a given execution along with any tests that have failed or are being skipped entirely. This will make it much easier to view what tests are really running to avoid accidental tests being skipped or not run at all.

Tests that are parameterized will print their parameters in the log.

Junit was updated to the latest Junit 5 version available.

Back-ported from: #1029

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica [email protected]

As mentioned at the bottom of the maven surefire plugin a treeview
is available to format the output of our Junit tests as they are
executed.

This is setup to suppress any output that is not part of a test that
has failed.

The treeview is able to allow easier view of tests that are actually
run during a given execution along with any tests that have failed or
are being skipped entirely. This will make it much easier to view what
tests are really running to avoid accidental tests being skipped or not
run at all.

Tests that are parameterized will print their parameters in the log.

Junit was updated to the latest Junit 5 version available.

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@KostasTsiounis KostasTsiounis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jasonkatonica jasonkatonica merged commit 5a1cc34 into IBM:java11 Dec 12, 2025
3 checks passed
@jasonkatonica jasonkatonica deleted the katonica/feature/testtreeview-java11 branch December 12, 2025 18:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants