Skip to content

Comments

[Snyk] Security upgrade express from 4.21.2 to 4.22.0#14

Open
nicholas-lockhart wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-a814e5cf526273360f9455133787ae89
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade express from 4.21.2 to 4.22.0#14
nicholas-lockhart wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-a814e5cf526273360f9455133787ae89

Conversation

@nicholas-lockhart
Copy link

@nicholas-lockhart nicholas-lockhart commented Feb 12, 2026

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json
  • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-JS-QS-15268416
  708  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling


Note

Low Risk
Dependency-only bump for Express and its transitive tree; risk is limited to potential subtle HTTP routing/parsing behavior changes in the updated framework stack.

Overview
Upgrades express from 4.21.2 to 4.22.0 (and updates package.json accordingly) to address a Snyk-reported vulnerability.

Refreshes package-lock.json to align with the new Express release, including updated dependency ranges and new/updated transitive packages (notably qs and side-channel* related modules).

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit ed8dcef. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants