docs(ruff): correct the E501 comment - #171
Merged
Merged
Conversation
docs(ruff): correct the E501 comment
LeyckerS
approved these changes
Aug 20, 2026
LeyckerS
left a comment
LeyckerS
left a comment
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Verified rather than read, per the house rule:
- The diff is exactly the text #79 prescribes — one line, one file, nothing else touched.
- The new comment is true. With this repo's config and the CI's own pin (
ruff==0.16.1), a 206-character line passesruff checkwithout a murmur, and.github/workflows/lint.ymlrunsruff check .only —ruff formatappears nowhere in CI. So nothing enforces line length, which is what the line now says. The old comment pointed atline-length = 100as if something read it; withE501off, nothing does. ruff check .on the full tree passes, matching the green ruff job here.
Merging. Thank you, @FlaggedATX — a first pull request that says something true about the file it edits is exactly the point of #79.
LeyckerS
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2026
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
LeyckerS
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2026
The CLI's progress line now comes from Engine.snapshot(); the rest is accounting, one GUI note and CI, plus the last four stale version strings. - #154 (@breezeFur, #97) CLI progress from the engine snapshot, explicit phases - #175 (@snowyukitty, #172) final write buffer no longer counted twice - #169 (@yhuikzdtguioaert, #83) Extractors slider shows min(Extractors, Pages) - #176 (@tunglambk, #174) node --check gate for web/ - #165 (@nightcityblade, #164) ruff.toml and pytest.ini watched by CI - #168 (@StefStrg, #93) docs-cli-check watches its own file on PRs - #170 (@harshvardhan60792, #160) regression test for the download_file stub - #171 (@FlaggedATX, #79) honest E501 comment in ruff.toml - #167 (@mazi-eth, #80) dead _LOG_MAX_LINES removed - SECURITY.md, web/index.html, web/app.js, bug_report.yml: 14.x/4.0 -> 4.x/v4.2 README: new "What V4.2 is", 4.1 demoted to "was", test count 50 -> 68. AUTHORS: @breezeFur added. Changelog: the double append predates #150. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
docs(ruff): correct the E501 comment
Description
This is a documentation change, replaces the incorrect documentation of E501 (line 10) on ruff.toml for a correct one
Type of change
Checklist
applied the equivalent change to
moon_cli.pydescription
Screenshots / logs (if applicable)