-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 159
feat(rest-api): iPXE template + templated-OS REST endpoints #3569
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
pbreton
wants to merge
18
commits into
NVIDIA:main
Choose a base branch
from
pbreton:feat/ipxe-templated-os-3
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e38b94a
rest-api(api): iPXE template + templated-OS REST API, SDK & OpenAPI
pbreton 2bc218c
address CodeRabbit comments
pbreton 1d9c325
rest-api(api): tighten templated iPXE review fixes
pbreton efcead5
address CodeRabbit comments (3)
pbreton 3f039f7
address CodeRabbit comments (4)
pbreton 3ba6fc1
iPXE template based OS can only be synced if the iPXE template is ava…
pbreton f07ff7c
fixes after rebase
pbreton 5a0be8f
rest-api: remove Operating System scope; derive sync direction from s…
pbreton ac78d99
rest-api: stop OS Image reconcile from clobbering iPXE OS associations
pbreton b5c08ca
regenerated doc and sdk
pbreton 78c41fa
address CodeRabbit comments (5)
pbreton f52684d
rest-api: use API-owned DTOs for OS iPXE parameters/artifacts
pbreton 95f9b28
rest-api: don't cache tenant resolution on transient lookup failure
pbreton 0182c9a
address CodeRabbit comments (6)
pbreton e382842
ci: retrigger required checks
pbreton 9d96343
update comments and text to remove OS scope references
pbreton 87cedc7
rest-api: regenerate OpenAPI docs after rebase onto upstream/main
pbreton 513648d
rest-api(api): fold templated-OS instance tests into instance_test.go
pbreton File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we make this move common?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since the direction seems to move away from multisite I would not (we already removed multisite oriented features from the templated-OS implementation). I would expect all site association tables to go away and be replace by a single SiteID in the record.