Skip to content

docs: propagate the get_parkinson_vol rename into the docs - #25

Merged
Sean-Koval merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/propagate-parkinson-rename
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

docs: propagate the get_parkinson_vol rename into the docs#25
Sean-Koval merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/propagate-parkinson-rename

Conversation

@Sean-Koval

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes a red main.

Merging the rename (#24) alongside the docs stack left main internally inconsistent: the Rust
symbol was renamed to get_parkinson_vol, but moduleDocs.ts, the generated
modules/util-volatility.md and apiInventory.ts still referenced get_parksinson_vol. So
check:examples and check:api-drift both failed on main — a documented example calling a
symbol that no longer exists.

This was a known, tracked consequence of the merge order: the rename branch carried the pre-#18 page
generator, so regenerating from it would have reverted the honest-status work.

What changed

  • Three references in docs-site/src/data/moduleDocs.ts
  • Regenerated the 39 module pages (via the generator, not by hand)
  • Regenerated docs-site/src/data/apiInventory.ts

Verification — all five gates

astro build 0 · check-content-schema 0 · check-links 0 · check:examples 0 (39 examples across
33 pages) · check:api-drift 0

Worth noting: this is precisely the failure check:examples was built for, and it caught it.

Merging the rename (#24) alongside the docs stack left main inconsistent:
the Rust symbol was renamed but moduleDocs.ts, the generated
util-volatility page and apiInventory.ts still referenced the old
spelling, so check:examples and check:api-drift both failed on main.

Updated the three references in moduleDocs.ts, regenerated the module
pages and regenerated the API inventory.

This is exactly the failure the new check:examples gate exists to catch,
and it caught it.
@Sean-Koval
Sean-Koval merged commit a3ed856 into main Aug 31, 2026
2 of 4 checks passed
@Sean-Koval
Sean-Koval deleted the fix/propagate-parkinson-rename branch August 31, 2026 03:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant