Skip to content

Conversation

@isaacdevlugt
Copy link
Contributor

Context: The copy in the sharp bits page for qml.allocate's differences from PL doesn't quite illustrate the behaviour properly.

Description of the Change: Adds clarification

Benefits: Clarity

Possible Drawbacks:

Related GitHub Issues:

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.27%. Comparing base (64813a2) to head (d85a8ee).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2317      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.27%   97.27%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         107      107              
  Lines       12952    12950       -2     
  Branches     1077     1077              
==========================================
- Hits        12599    12597       -2     
  Misses        290      290              
  Partials       63       63              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

initial ones from ``qml.device``. If the pool of wires from ``device`` is
called "device" and the pool of wires from ``qml.allocate`` is called
"dynamic", future calls to ``qml.allocate`` can reuse wires from the
dynamic pool, but not from the device pool.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants