Add exclude options based on @bdrogja's work #732

[Dfte]

Description

Opening this PR to continue @bdrogja work from #732.

This PR adds two new config options allowing to exclude some IP's from NetExec and excluding local IP's as well:

The exclude_hosts option is an array that can take multiple type of values:

• An IP
• a range 192.168.X.X - 192.168.X.Y
• A CIDR 192.168.56.0/24
• A file path containing all of the above

For example:

exclude_hosts = [192.168.56.60", "/opt/tools/ad/NetExec/test"]

As @bdrogja mentions, this PR also closes #674.

I don't know if the test.py part is relevant anymore tho.

Type of change

Insert an "x" inside the brackets for relevant items (do not delete options)

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Deprecation of feature or functionality
• This change requires a documentation update
• This requires a third party update (such as Impacket, Dploot, lsassy, etc)
• This PR was created with the assistance of AI (list what type of assistance, tool(s)/model(s) in the description)

Checklist :

Insert an "x" inside the brackets for completed and relevant items (do not delete options)

• I have ran Ruff against my changes (poetry: poetry run ruff check ., use --fix to automatically fix what it can)
• I have added or updated the tests/e2e_commands.txt file if necessary (new modules or features are required to be added to the e2e tests)
• If reliant on changes of third party dependencies, such as Impacket, dploot, lsassy, etc, I have linked the relevant PRs in those projects
• I have linked relevant sources that describes the added technique (blog posts, documentation, etc)
• [ x] I have performed a self-review of my own code (not an AI review)
• [x ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (PR here: https://github.com/Pennyw0rth/NetExec-Wiki)

[NeffIsBack]

Nice! Thanks for the work.

[NeffIsBack]

@Marshall-Hallenbeck the PR description check crashed again

[Dfte]

@Marshall-Hallenbeck the PR description check crashed again

I think because I removed the setup #

[NeffIsBack]

@Marshall-Hallenbeck the PR description check crashed again

I think because I removed the setup #

Naa it should comment and yell at you, not fail to run

[Dfte]

Thinking of how I'd use this PR, I'd also add the options that were developed by @bdrojga vefor (--exlude-hosts and --skip-self)