Skip to content

feat(dbdr/net-peering) [STORY-3557] Add commands to configure net peerings of DB-DR#1208

Draft
leo-scalingo wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/STORY-3557/db-dr-net-peering
Draft

feat(dbdr/net-peering) [STORY-3557] Add commands to configure net peerings of DB-DR#1208
leo-scalingo wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/STORY-3557/db-dr-net-peering

Conversation

@leo-scalingo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

  • Add a changelog entry in the section "To Be Released" of CHANGELOG.md

@leo-scalingo leo-scalingo self-assigned this Mar 26, 2026
@notion-workspace
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@leo-scalingo leo-scalingo force-pushed the feat/STORY-3557/db-dr-net-peering branch from 55bd16b to 0450112 Compare March 26, 2026 17:06
Comment thread cmd/error.go
fmt.Println(io.Indent(err.Error(), 7))
}

case http.StatusConflict: // 409
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

question: do we want to also handle debug here? (like for 404)

Comment thread go.mod Outdated
require (
github.com/AlecAivazis/survey/v2 v2.3.7
github.com/Scalingo/go-scalingo/v11 v11.0.0
github.com/Scalingo/go-scalingo/v11 v11.0.1-0.20260324141225-65ad50946664
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

note: this shouldn't be merged as is a should use a go-scalingo release.

Comment thread CHANGELOG.md

## To Be Released

* feat(dbdr/net-peering) [STORY-3557] Add commands to configure net peerings of DB-DR
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nitpick: most of the time we are not mentioning story number on the public changelog.

Comment thread dbng/networking.go
_ = t.Bulk([][]string{
{"Outscale account ID", networkConfiguration.OutscaleAccountID},
{"Outscale net ID", networkConfiguration.OutscaleNetID},
{"IP range", networkConfiguration.IPRange},
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

question: no need for the OutscaleSourceAccountID like for the list?

@leo-scalingo leo-scalingo force-pushed the feat/STORY-3557/db-dr-net-peering branch from 0450112 to abd4703 Compare April 7, 2026 15:19
@leo-scalingo leo-scalingo force-pushed the feat/STORY-3557/db-dr-net-peering branch 2 times, most recently from 32e6de4 to b40097a Compare May 13, 2026 13:03
@leo-scalingo leo-scalingo force-pushed the feat/STORY-3557/db-dr-net-peering branch from b40097a to fd0aa5d Compare May 13, 2026 15:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants