-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
docs: Update PII Scrubbing in Logs doc #2156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jugal Kishore <[email protected]>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
@gemini-cli /review |
|
🤖 Hi @makeavish, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📋 Review Summary
This Pull Request updates the PII Scrubbing in Logs documentation, improving clarity, completeness, and adherence to documentation standards. The changes enhance the guide by providing more comprehensive options for log ingestion and better formatting for code examples.
🔍 General Feedback
- The addition of a
descriptionin the frontmatter is a good improvement for SEO and discoverability. - The reformatting of the sample log JSON and the
<figure>component significantly improves readability. - Ensure consistency in terminology and code block formatting for a polished user experience.
|
Claude finished @crazyuploader's task —— View job Review of PR #2156I've reviewed the documentation updates for the PII Scrubbing guide. Here's my comprehensive feedback based on the repository's CONTRIBUTING.md standards: ✅ Positive Changes
🔍 Issues FoundI've posted inline comments on the specific lines that need attention: 1. Typos (Critical)
|
Signed-off-by: Jugal Kishore <[email protected]>
|
Claude finished @crazyuploader's task —— View job Review CompleteI've reviewed the PII Scrubbing documentation update against the repository's CONTRIBUTING.md standards. Issues Identified1. Critical Typo on Line 116
|
Signed-off-by: Jugal Kishore <[email protected]>
|
Claude finished @crazyuploader's task —— View job Documentation Review CompleteTodo List
SummaryGood news! The latest commits have successfully addressed the previously identified issues. The documentation now meets the repository's CONTRIBUTING.md standards. What Was Fixed ✅The recent commits (663ddd1 and ca7a003) have corrected:
Note: I see previous review comments mentioned a typo "Trasform" on line 52, but this doesn't exist in the current version of the file ( Review Against CONTRIBUTING.md PR ChecklistReviewing against the Docs PR Checklist: ✅ Frontmatter: Includes Minor Recommendation (Optional)Since this guide is tagged for <Admonition type="info">
Using self-hosted SigNoz? Most steps are identical. To adapt this guide, update the endpoint
and remove the ingestion key header as shown in [Cloud →
Self-Hosted](https://signoz.io/docs/ingestion/cloud-vs-self-hosted/#cloud-to-self-hosted).
</Admonition>However, this is optional since the PII scrubbing configuration itself is identical for both Cloud and Self-Host - only the collector endpoint configuration differs, which is covered in the linked documentation. ConclusionStatus: ✅ Approved - Ready to Merge The documentation is well-structured, clear, and meets all the repository standards. All previously identified issues have been fixed in the latest commits. Great work! |
|
@gemini-cli /review |
|
🤖 Hi @makeavish, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📋 Review Summary
This Pull Request updates the PII Scrubbing in Logs documentation. The changes improve clarity, expand on log collection methods, and enhance the formatting of code snippets and figures.
🔍 General Feedback
- The overall content improvements are good, making the guide more comprehensive and easier to follow.
- Minor adjustments were suggested for adherence to documentation guidelines regarding tags, external link attributes, and acronym definitions.
Signed-off-by: Jugal Kishore <[email protected]>
Closes: #2003