Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

29 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

If our project helps you, please give us a star ⭐ and cite our paper!

Paper PDF arXiv EMNLP 2026 Main Conference MIT License BibTeX citation

News

  • [2026-08-21] Our paper was accepted to the EMNLP 2026 Main Conference.

Overview

Most jailbreak evaluations study discrete prompt templates whose surface forms can be fingerprinted and patched. We study a different axis: register shift. The same harmful behavior can be expressed through a natural writing register that an aligned model has learned well but its safety training may under-cover.

We instantiate this idea with twelve recurring writing registers drawn from Archive of Our Own (AO3) fanfiction. Our experiments cover eight aligned LLMs, 290 unique behaviors from HarmBench and JailbreakBench, twelve registers, and a four-judge ensemble. We also introduce VAR-A4, a fixed four-turn extension that uses no adversarial attacker LLM and no per-target optimization during target interaction.

VAR experimental framework

Research questions

  1. Does a natural writing register increase attack success beyond existing jailbreak structures?
  2. Can the effect be separated from prompt length and structural-template confounds?
  3. Does register conditioning persist across models, hazards, defenses, and multi-turn dialogue?
  4. Can a static four-turn progression outperform adaptive and longer alternatives?

Method

Single-turn vernacular attack

For each behavior-register pair, five passages sampled from the corresponding AO3 subgenre condition a target-agnostic creative-writing rewrite. The generated user prompt frames the evaluated behavior as the climax of a natural scene in that register.

The twelve register carriers are summarized below. They cover document-like, perspective-based, culturally specific, relational, and pacing-oriented narrative conventions.

The twelve AO3 registers

Factorial attribution

We cross the twelve registers with seven structural conditions, producing 84 cells. Length-matched controls and behavior-by-model clustered GEE models separate the contribution of register from structure and prompt length.

Factorial experiment cell means

VAR-A4

VAR-A4 extends the strongest single-turn register into a fixed four-turn progression:

  1. Register entry: establish the register-conditioned scene.
  2. Scene expansion: continue the scene with concrete sensory and procedural detail.
  3. Specificity escalation: increase specificity about actions, materials, and decisions.
  4. Compilation: combine the preceding material into one chronological response.

The concatenated T1-T4 response is evaluated as a single output. The construction is static: it uses neither attacker-model feedback nor per-target optimization during target interaction.

VAR-A4 four-turn pipeline

Main results

Setting Mean ASR Summary
Existing single-turn baselines 0.278 Six prior attack structures
Length-matched controls 0.350 Baselines rewritten to match vernacular prompt length
Vernacular attacks 0.731 Mean over twelve register arms
T1-only screenplay attack 0.894 Strongest single-turn register
VAR-A4 (screenplay) 0.924 Fixed four-turn sequence

Across the eight models, vernacular prompts raise mean single-turn ASR from 0.278 to 0.731, a 3.11x vernacular-to-baseline ratio. The advantage remains after length matching. The factorial experiment further shows that register conditioning, rather than a particular jailbreak structure, drives the main gain.

Per-arm single-turn attack success rates

Key result tables

Per-model and per-benchmark single-turn attack success rates

Register meta-prompt comparison Multi-turn comparison

VAR-A4 reaches 0.924 mean ASR, exceeding Crescendo, FITD, ActorAttack, and the corresponding T1-only attack. Structural ablations show that compilation at T4 provides the largest marginal contribution among the tested turns; duplicating a turn with an added paraphrase does not improve the full sequence.

VAR-A4 structural ablations

Evaluation protocol

Every prompt-response pair receives four independent labels:

  • HarmBench-13B binary classifier
  • LlamaGuard-3-8B binary safety classifier
  • WildGuard-7B binary safety classifier
  • GPT-5.4-mini scoring the StrongREJECT rubric, thresholded at 0.25

The reported attack-success label uses a two-of-four ensemble. The paper additionally reports raw agreement, Cohen's kappa, PABAK, Gwet's AC1, a blinded 200-item human audit, cluster-bootstrap intervals, and StrongREJECT-threshold robustness.

Research artifact

The public research artifact is available in artifact/. It includes the implementation, safely shareable data, evaluation tools, and reproduction documentation. See artifact/README.md for details.

Paper and figures

The camera-ready paper is available as VAR_EMNLP_2026.pdf. Selected publication-quality figure PDFs are provided under their paper numbering:

Show all figure files
Figure Description PDF
1 Scenario comparison PDF
2 Experimental design framework PDF
3 VAR-A4 pipeline PDF
4 Per-arm single-turn ASR PDF
5 Factorial experiment cell means PDF
6 ASR by prompt-length bucket PDF
7 Four-judge Cohen's kappa matrices PDF
8 Five-shot register meta-prompt PDF
9 Twelve AO3 register carriers PDF
10 Worked VAR-A4 example PDF
11 Per-judge and ensemble ASR PDF
19 Single-turn examples, set 1 PDF
20 Single-turn examples, set 2 PDF
21 Multi-turn transcript, example 1 PDF
22 Multi-turn transcript, example 2 PDF

Responsible release

This repository supports safety research on aligned language models. Worked examples in the paper redact operationally sensitive spans. Source-derived exemplars and unredacted attack material that could enable direct misuse are not included in this release. The artifact/ directory provides the implementation and safely shareable aggregate artifacts for method inspection and verification.

Citation

If this project is useful for your work, please cite:

@inproceedings{luo2026voices,
  title     = {Voices Across Registers: Corpus-Conditioned Vernacular Jailbreaks against Aligned LLMs via Fanfiction Subgenres},
  author    = {Luo, Zhongze and Shi, Ruihe and Yin, Zhenshuai and Liu, Haoyue and Wan, Weixuan and Tang, Xiaoying},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},
  year      = {2026}
}

An earlier version is available as:

@article{luo2026off,
  title   = {Off-Distribution Voices: Fanfiction Subgenres as Universal Vernacular Jailbreaks for Aligned LLMs},
  author  = {Luo, Zhongze and Shi, Ruihe and Yin, Zhenshuai and Liu, Haoyue and Wan, Weixuan and Tang, Xiaoying},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.04483},
  year    = {2026}
}

About

[EMNLP 2026] Voices Across Registers: Corpus-Conditioned Vernacular Jailbreaks against Aligned LLMs via Fanfiction Subgenres

Resources

Stars

4 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages