test: setup browser and SSR testing #20
Conversation
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @XiNiHa, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request focuses on setting up browser and SSR testing environments. It involves modifications to the package.json file to update testing scripts and dependencies, as well as changes to the pnpm-lock.yaml file to reflect the updated dependency tree. The key changes include removing @solidjs/testing-library and happy-dom, while adding @vitest/browser and playwright to facilitate browser testing. The test configuration is updated to use vitest workspaces, separating browser and SSR tests.
Highlights
- Dependency Updates: The pull request updates the project's dependencies, replacing
@solidjs/testing-libraryandhappy-domwith@vitest/browserandplaywrightto enable browser testing capabilities. - Testing Script Modification: The
testscript inpackage.jsonis modified to remove the--uiflag from thevitestcommand, streamlining the testing process. - Vitest Workspaces: The pull request introduces vitest workspaces, separating browser and SSR tests into different configurations. This allows for more targeted and efficient testing.
Changelog
Click here to see the changelog
- package.json
- Removes the
--uiflag from thetestscript. - Replaces
@solidjs/testing-libraryandhappy-domwith@vitest/browserandplaywright.
- Removes the
- pnpm-lock.yaml
- Updates dependency versions and resolutions to reflect the changes in
package.json. - Removes entries related to
@solidjs/testing-libraryandhappy-dom. - Adds entries for
@vitest/browserandplaywright.
- Updates dependency versions and resolutions to reflect the changes in
- tests/createLazyLoadQuery.test.browser.tsx
- Updates imports to use
@vitest/browser/contextinstead of@solidjs/testing-library. - Updates assertions to use playwright's
expectinstead of@testing-library/jest-dom. - Removes
renderScreenand usesrenderToBodyinstead.
- Updates imports to use
- tests/createLazyLoadQuery.test.ssr.tsx
- Creates a new test file for SSR testing.
- tests/utils.ts
- Creates a new file with utility functions for testing.
- tsconfig.json
- Adds references to new tsconfig files for browser and SSR tests.
- tsconfig.test.browser.json
- Creates a new tsconfig file for browser tests, including playwright types and excluding SSR tests.
- tsconfig.test.ssr.json
- Creates a new tsconfig file for SSR tests, excluding browser tests.
- vitest.config.ts
- Configures vitest workspaces to separate browser and SSR tests.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
In browser's light, tests now reside,
SSR's realm, where servers confide.
Workspaces defined,
A testing new find,
Bugs tremble, where they can't hide.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request sets up browser and SSR testing using Vitest. It includes changes to package.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, tsconfig.json, and vitest.config.ts, as well as adding a new test file and a utility file. The changes look good overall, but there are a few areas that could be improved.
Summary of Findings
- Testing Environment Configuration: The configuration for browser and SSR testing environments in
vitest.config.tsseems well-structured, but it's crucial to ensure that the conditions and configurations for each environment are correctly set up to avoid conflicts or unexpected behavior during testing. - Dependency Updates and Removals: The
pnpm-lock.yamlfile shows significant dependency updates and removals. It's important to verify that these changes don't introduce any compatibility issues or break existing functionality. Pay close attention to the removal of@solidjs/testing-libraryandhappy-domand the addition of@vitest/browserandplaywright. - Browser Test Assertions: The browser tests are updated to use
@vitest/browser/contextandpagefor assertions. Ensure that these new assertions are correctly implemented and provide equivalent or better coverage compared to the previous testing library.
Merge Readiness
The pull request introduces significant changes to the testing setup. While the changes seem reasonable, it's crucial to ensure that all tests pass in both browser and SSR environments before merging. I recommend verifying the test coverage and functionality after these changes. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging.
XiNiHa
force-pushed
the
ssr-tests
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7a6eeef to
b0ffd19
Compare
commit: |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #20 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 27.13% 32.23% +5.10%
==========================================
Files 21 21
Lines 1360 1461 +101
Branches 65 68 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 369 471 +102
+ Misses 991 990 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Preview URL | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ Deployment successful! View logs |
solid-relay | a5d40f8 | Commit Preview URL Branch Preview URL |
Aug 14 2025, 12:24 PM |
|
Claude finished @XiNiHa's task —— View job Pull Request ReviewI'll review this PR that sets up browser and SSR testing infrastructure. Let me analyze the changes systematically: Todo List:
Review Feedback✅ Strengths
🔍 Areas for ImprovementCode Quality & Best Practices
Performance Considerations
Security Concerns
Test Coverage & Quality
Configuration Issues
📋 Minor Issues
🎯 Recommendations
📊 Overall AssessmentThis is a well-executed migration that:
The architecture changes are sound and will provide a solid foundation for testing both browser and SSR scenarios. The identified issues are minor and easily addressable. Recommendation: ✅ Approve with minor fixes |
No description provided.