Feat/asyncapi add reply

[stefan-vasilenko]

Description

Added reply generation to AsyncApi scheme v3.0.0

Fixes #1586

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
• This change requires a documentation update

Checklist

• My code adheres to the style guidelines of this project (just lint shows no errors)
• I have conducted a self-review of my own code
• I have made the necessary changes to the documentation
• My changes do not generate any new warnings
• I have added tests to validate the effectiveness of my fix or the functionality of my new feature
• Both new and existing unit tests pass successfully on my local environment by running just test-coverage
• I have ensured that static analysis tests are passing by running just static-analysis
• I have included code examples to illustrate the modifications

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[stefan-vasilenko]

@Lancetnik Hi!
I’ve added a reply to the schema generation — could you please check the implementation?

I also have a question: after my changes, a lot of tests started failing because they assert the exact payload output, like this:

        assert len(payload) == 1

        key, value = next(iter(payload.items()))

        assert key == "User"
        assert value == {
            "properties": IsDict({
                "id": {"title": "Id", "type": "integer"},
                "email": {"default": "", "title": "Email", "type": "string"},
            })
            | IsDict({
                "id": {"title": "Id", "type": "integer"},
                "name": {"default": "", "title": "Name", "type": "string"},
            }),
            "required": ["id"],
            "title": key,
            "type": "object",
        }

The failures are caused by the fact that I added a new payload to the output.

Do you think it makes sense to update all these tests, or is there a better way to handle this?

[Lancetnik]

@stefan-vasilenko thank you! At first look everything looks fine. Let me check in details, what we can make with failing tests