Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 24, 2026. It is now read-only.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion package.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
"ultracite": "7.0.8",
"vitest": "^4.0.17"
},
"packageManager": "pnpm@10.28.2",
"packageManager": "pnpm@10.30.2",
"engines": {
"pnpm": "10.28.2",
"node": ">=22.18.0"
Comment on lines +141 to 144
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: The packageManager field specifies pnpm@10.30.2 while the engines.pnpm field requires 10.28.2, creating a version conflict within package.json.
Severity: MEDIUM

Suggested Fix

Update the engines.pnpm field in package.json to match the version specified in the packageManager field. Change "pnpm": "10.28.2" to "pnpm": "10.30.2" to ensure consistency.

Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.

Location: package.json#L141-L144

Potential issue: An automated dependency update modified the `packageManager` field in
`package.json` to `pnpm@10.30.2` but did not update the `engines.pnpm` field, which
remains at `10.28.2`. This creates a configuration inconsistency where different tools
may enforce conflicting versions of the package manager. For example, Corepack will use
the version from `packageManager`, while other validation scripts might enforce the
`engines` field. This can lead to unpredictable behavior, build failures in certain
environments, and increased debugging time for developers trying to resolve
environment-specific issues.

Expand Down
Loading