-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
(fix)[variant] enhance VARIANT bloom filter & inverted index validation #59921
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…bcolumns in FE validation
…IANT subcolumns in FE validation
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 31954 ms |
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 32435 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 173807 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 26.78 s |
BE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
|
run cloud_p0 |
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 31523 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 174184 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 26.95 s |
FE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
BE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 32499 ms |
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
eldenmoon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
| + fieldPattern + " is not supported for inverted index" | ||
| + " of column: " + column.getName()); | ||
| } | ||
| checkVariantFieldPatternInvertedIndex(column.getName(), fieldPattern, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
这里为啥不直接调用 InvertedIndexUtil.checkInvertedIndexParser
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
已内联并删除该函数,保持逻辑不变
be/src/vec/common/schema_util.cpp
Outdated
| // above types are not supported in bf | ||
| if (is_bf_supported_by_fe_for_variant_subcolumn(target.type())) { | ||
| target.set_is_bf_column(source.is_bf_column()); | ||
| } else if (source.is_bf_column()) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
这个日志不用打,或者改成debug,info 太频繁了
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
已删除此处日志打印
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 31460 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 172708 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 26.84 s |
FE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
BE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
eldenmoon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
csun5285
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…on (#59921) 1. keep variant subcolumn BF support aligned with FE DDL checks (BE) 2. reject analyzed inverted index on non-text VARIANT subcolumns (FE) 3. reject dict-compressed inverted index on non-text VARIANT subcolumns (FE)
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
Release note
None
Check List (For Author)
Test
Behavior changed:
Does this need documentation?
Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)