[MRESOLVER-247] IT update for resolver behaviour change#140
Open
[MRESOLVER-247] IT update for resolver behaviour change#140
Conversation
I tried to be least intrusive here (so I left old but added new values w/ explanation). Once MRESOLVER-247 is merged, and maven consumes it, this IT will fail, as maven will resolve LESS then this IT expects.
michael-o
reviewed
Mar 11, 2022
Member
michael-o
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't understand this change. Why 140+? And how did + 4 make it to - 4? Moving the expected value to a constant make sense, but the rest is unclear.
Member
Author
Changes one by one:
Example of log entries for POM that went thru model builder vs Super POM (reformatted for easier read, they are all one liners): |
Member
|
Is this one still necessary? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Once MRESOLVER-247 is merged, and maven consumes it, this IT
will fail, as maven will resolve LESS then this IT expects.
This change makes IT perform same assertion ("no POM is read twice") but
without locking down the absolute number of POMs read.