WARNING: MAJOR (BREAKING) CHANGE: Update dependency org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http to v12 [SECURITY] (master)

[renovatebot-confluentinc]

For any questions/concerns about this PR, please review the Renovate Bot wiki/FAQs, or the #renovatebot Slack channel.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http (source)	9.4.20.v20190813 -> 12.0.12

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the warning logs for more information.

---

Jetty invalid URI parsing may produce invalid HttpURI.authority

CVE-2022-2047 / GHSA-cj7v-27pg-wf7q

More information

Details

Description

URI use within Jetty's HttpURI class can parse invalid URIs such as http://localhost;/path as having an authority with a host of localhost;.

A URIs of the type http://localhost;/path should be interpreted to be either invalid or as localhost; to be the userinfo and no host.
However, HttpURI.host returns localhost; which is definitely wrong.

Impact

This can lead to errors with Jetty's HttpClient, and Jetty's ProxyServlet / AsyncProxyServlet / AsyncMiddleManServlet wrongly interpreting an authority with no host as one with a host.

Patches

Patched in PR #​8146 for Jetty version 9.4.47.
Patched in PR #​8014 for Jetty versions 10.0.10, and 11.0.10

Workarounds

None.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

• Email us at [email protected].

Severity

• CVSS Score: 2.7 / 10 (Low)
• Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

References

• https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-cj7v-27pg-wf7q
• https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2047
• https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project
• https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/08/msg00011.html
• https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220901-0006
• https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5198

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

---

Jetty accepts "+" prefixed value in Content-Length

CVE-2023-40167 / GHSA-hmr7-m48g-48f6

More information

Details

Impact

Jetty accepts the '+' character proceeding the content-length value in a HTTP/1 header field. This is more permissive than allowed by the RFC and other servers routinely reject such requests with 400 responses. There is no known exploit scenario, but it is conceivable that request smuggling could result if jetty is used in combination with a server that does not close the connection after sending such a 400 response.

Workarounds

There is no workaround as there is no known exploit scenario.

Original Report

RFC 9110 Secion 8.6 defined the value of Content-Length header should be a string of 0-9 digits. However we found that Jetty accepts "+" prefixed Content-Length, which could lead to potential HTTP request smuggling.

Payload:

 POST / HTTP/1.1
 Host: a.com
 Content-Length: +16
 Connection: close
 ​
 0123456789abcdef

When sending this payload to Jetty, it can successfully parse and identify the length.

When sending this payload to NGINX, Apache HTTPd or other HTTP servers/parsers, they will return 400 bad request.

This behavior can lead to HTTP request smuggling and can be leveraged to bypass WAF or IDS.

Severity

• CVSS Score: 5.3 / 10 (Medium)
• Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

References

• https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-hmr7-m48g-48f6
• https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40167
• https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project
• https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/09/msg00039.html
• https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5507
• https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110#section-8.6

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

---

Eclipse Jetty URI parsing of invalid authority

CVE-2024-6763 / GHSA-qh8g-58pp-2wxh

More information

Details

Summary

Eclipse Jetty is a lightweight, highly scalable, Java-based web server and Servlet engine . It includes a utility class, HttpURI, for URI/URL parsing.

The HttpURI class does insufficient validation on the authority segment of a URI. However the behaviour of HttpURI differs from the common browsers in how it handles a URI that would be considered invalid if fully validated against the RRC. Specifically HttpURI and the browser may differ on the value of the host extracted from an invalid URI and thus a combination of Jetty and a vulnerable browser may be vulnerable to a open redirect attack or to a SSRF attack if the URI is used after passing validation checks.

Details

Affected components

The vulnerable component is the HttpURI class when used as a utility class in an application. The Jetty usage of the class is not vulnerable.

Attack overview

The HttpURI class does not well validate the authority section of a URI. When presented with an illegal authority that may contain user info (eg username:password#@​hostname:port), then the parsing of the URI is not failed. Moreover, the interpretation of what part of the authority is the host name differs from a common browser in that they also do not fail, but they select a different host name from the illegal URI.

Attack scenario

A typical attack scenario is illustrated in the diagram below. The Validator checks whether the attacker-supplied URL is on the blocklist. If not, the URI is passed to the Requester for redirection. The Requester is responsible for sending requests to the hostname specified by the URI.

This attack occurs when the Validator is the org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpURI class and the Requester is the Browser (include chrome, firefox and Safari). An attacker can send a malformed URI to the Validator (e.g., http://browser.check%23%40vulndetector.com/ ). After validation, the Validator finds that the hostname is not on the blocklist. However, the Requester can still send requests to the domain with the hostname vulndetector.com.

PoC

payloads:

http://browser.check &@​vulndetector.com/
http://browser.check #@​vulndetector.com/
http://browser.check?@​vulndetector.com/
http://browser.check#@​vulndetector.com/
http://vulndetector.com\\/

The problem of 302 redirect parsing in HTML tag scenarios. Below is a poc example. After clicking the button, the browser will open "browser.check", and jetty will parse this URL as "vulndetector.com".

<a href="http://browser.check#@&#8203;vulndetector.com/"></a>

A comparison of the parsing differences between Jetty and chrome is shown in the table below (note that neither should accept the URI as valid).

Invalid URI	Jetty	Chrome
http://browser.check &@​vulndetector.com/	vulndetector.com	browser.check
http://browser.check #@​vulndetector.com/	vulndetector.com	browser.check
http://browser.check?@​vulndetector.com/	vulndetector.com	browser.check
http://browser.check#@​vulndetector.com/	vulndetector.com	browser.check

The problem of 302 redirect parsing in HTTP 302 Location

Input	Jetty	Chrome
http://browser.check%5c/	browser.check\	browser.check

It is noteworthy that Spring Web also faced similar security vulnerabilities, being affected by the aforementioned four types of payloads. These issues have since been resolved and have been assigned three CVE numbers [3-5].

Impact

The impact of this vulnerability is limited to developers that use the Jetty HttpURI directly. Example: your project implemented a blocklist to block on some hosts based on HttpURI's handling of authority section. The vulnerability will help attackers bypass the protections that developers have set up for hosts. The vulnerability will lead to SSRF[1] and URL Redirection[2] vulnerabilities in several cases.

Mitigation

The attacks outlined above rely on decoded user data being passed to the HttpURI class. Application should not pass decoded user data as an encoded URI to any URI class/method, including HttpURI. Such applications are likely to be vulnerable in other ways.
The immediate solution is to upgrade to a version of the class that will fully validate the characters of the URI authority. Ultimately, Jetty will deprecate and remove support for user info in the authority per RFC9110 Section 4.2.4.

Note that the Chrome (and other browsers) parse the invalid user info section improperly as well (due to flawed WhatWG URL parsing rules that do not apply outside of a Web Browser).

Reference

[1] https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html
[2] https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/601.html

Severity

• CVSS Score: 3.7 / 10 (Low)
• Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

References

• https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-qh8g-58pp-2wxh
• https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-6763
• https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/12012
• https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project
• https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignement/-/issues/25
• https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250306-0005

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[renovatebot-confluentinc]

Renovate Ignore Notification

Because you closed this PR without merging, Renovate will ignore this update. You will not get PRs for any future 12.x releases. But if you manually upgrade to 12.x then Renovate will re-enable minor and patch updates automatically.

If you accidentally closed this PR, or if you changed your mind: rename this PR to get a fresh replacement PR.