-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
Update readme about nri.sock and SELinux #219
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ngopalak-redhat
wants to merge
1
commit into
containerd:main
Choose a base branch
from
ngopalak-redhat:ngopalak/ngopalak_read_only
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ request and provide a response, both as JSON data. | |||||
|
|
||||||
| Plugins in NRI are daemon-like entities. A single instance of a plugin is | ||||||
| now responsible for handling the full stream of NRI events and requests. A | ||||||
| unix-domain socket is used as the transport for communication. Instead of | ||||||
| unix-domain socket (`/var/run/nri/nri.sock`) is used as the transport for communication. Instead of | ||||||
| JSON requests and responses NRI is defined as a formal, protobuf-based | ||||||
| 'NRI plugin protocol' which is compiled into ttRPC bindings. This should | ||||||
| result in improved communication efficiency with lower per-message overhead, | ||||||
|
|
@@ -491,6 +491,22 @@ access to these sockets and can act as NRI or Device Plugins. See the | |||||
| and [best practices](https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/best-practices/enforcing-pod-security-standards/) | ||||||
| about Kubernetes security. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| To use the plugins in SELinux-enabled environments, either create a new policy | ||||||
| or set the SELinux type to spc_t (Super Privileged Container) in the pod's security | ||||||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||
| context. For example: | ||||||
| ```yaml | ||||||
| spec: | ||||||
| template: | ||||||
| spec: | ||||||
| containers: | ||||||
| - name: plugin | ||||||
| ... | ||||||
| securityContext: | ||||||
| ... | ||||||
| seLinuxOptions: | ||||||
| type: spc_t | ||||||
| ``` | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## API Stability | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| NRI APIs should not be considered stable yet. We try to avoid unnecessarily | ||||||
|
|
||||||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pod security policies have been deprecated .. they've become levels assigned or via controller.. it's confusing :-)