Skip to content

Conversation

@baude
Copy link
Member

@baude baude commented Feb 26, 2025

A typo occurred when tagging the libhvee release so retracting that typo

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 26, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: baude

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Feb 26, 2025

If you tag a new version to make the module proxy pick it up it must also be retracted as well like in c/common
containers/common@a970d99

So my assumption is that we must list two versions there
cc @mtrmac

Copy link

@mtrmac mtrmac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, as @Luap99 says (and reference https://go.dev/ref/mod#go-mod-file-retract )

  • The v1.10.0 retraction must be published in a tagged release
  • That tagged release must be “latest”, maybe v1.10.1, to have effect
  • … and therefore, v1.10.1 must also be retracted, in the v1.10.1 tag.

So:

  • Merge a PR which retracts both v1.10.0 and v1.10.1
  • Tag that commit with v1.10.1
  • Hopefully, then Go will see v0.9.0 as the latest, and we can go on tagging v0.10.0 and the like.

A typo occurred when tagging the libhvee release so retracting that typo

Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <[email protected]>
Copy link

@mtrmac mtrmac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Feb 26, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Feb 26, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit a6de803 into containers:main Feb 26, 2025
5 checks passed
@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Feb 27, 2025

containers/podman#25411

Looks like it worked

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants