Skip to content

Conversation

@rittneje
Copy link
Contributor

@rittneje rittneje commented Dec 6, 2023

Closes #2118.

Copy link
Contributor

@mtrmac mtrmac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

My immediate reaction is that I don’t know how I feel about the way platforms.Parse defaults values; compare #1987 (comment) . The trade-off is consistency with containerd, which is certainly somewhat valuable.

Either way, this and #1987 should probably end up with a consistent answer to this trade-off.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Dec 6, 2023

@nalind thoughts?

@nalind
Copy link
Member

nalind commented Dec 8, 2023

This doesn't break anything, and it gets us closer to not being in the business of figuring out for ourselves which "variant" value to use on ARM boxes, so I'm fine with it. If that means reworking #1987, or scrapping it entirely, I'm not going to be particularly upset.

@github-actions
Copy link

A friendly reminder that this PR had no activity for 30 days.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

support override via platform specifier

4 participants