Skip to content

Conversation

@HearyShen
Copy link
Collaborator

What type of PR is this?

Check the PR title

  • This PR title match the format: [<type>][<scope>] <description>. For example: [fix][backend] flaky fix
  • The description of this PR title is user-oriented and clear enough for others to understand.
  • Add documentation if the current PR requires user awareness at the usage level.
  • This PR is written in English. PRs not in English will not be reviewed.

(Optional) Translate the PR title into Chinese

(Optional) More detailed description for this PR(en: English/zh: Chinese)

en:
zh(optional):

(Optional) Which issue(s) this PR fixes

@HearyShen HearyShen requested review from CozeLoop and removed request for CozeLoop December 18, 2025 12:06
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 76.34409% with 44 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...valuation/application/convertor/experiment/expt.go 68.75% 11 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...d/modules/evaluation/application/experiment_app.go 61.53% 12 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...nd/modules/evaluation/application/evaluator_app.go 64.28% 7 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...kend/modules/evaluation/domain/entity/evaluator.go 63.63% 4 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (76.34%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #331      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.92%   69.93%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         610      610              
  Lines       56835    56940     +105     
==========================================
+ Hits        39740    39822      +82     
- Misses      14144    14163      +19     
- Partials     2951     2955       +4     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 69.93% <76.34%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
.../evaluation/application/convertor/common/common.go 98.89% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
...ation/application/convertor/evaluator/evaluator.go 90.47% <100.00%> (+0.76%) ⬆️
backend/modules/evaluation/domain/entity/common.go 88.88% <ø> (ø)
...tion/domain/entity/evaluator_version_custom_rpc.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
backend/modules/evaluation/domain/entity/expt.go 96.77% <ø> (ø)
backend/modules/evaluation/domain/entity/param.go 64.28% <ø> (ø)
...odules/evaluation/domain/service/evaluator_impl.go 75.10% <100.00%> (ø)
...ation/domain/service/evaluator_source_code_impl.go 85.05% <100.00%> (ø)
...ion/domain/service/evaluator_source_prompt_impl.go 76.82% <100.00%> (ø)
...aluation/domain/service/expt_run_item_turn_impl.go 87.81% <100.00%> (+0.35%) ⬆️
... and 4 more

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5a30a06...e412f26. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@HearyShen HearyShen requested a review from CozeLoop December 18, 2025 13:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants