Merge request for 6502js #6
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…irefox and Safari.
…ain credits of other forks.
…lly running. make notes a popup.
…formatting issues.
…issing form label" errors. Trying to make this more ADA compliant.
… object can be found by the emulator.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@ctyler,
I used the original code from skilldrick for a while, then ran across your enhanced version. Recently, I saw what you did with syntax highlighting but decided to go a different direction with code-input and highlightjs. I've also changed the memory pseudo-ops (dsb, dsw, dcw, txt).
I recently wrote an assembler in Java and combined many of the addressing modes into fewer, slightly more dense versions. Unfortunately, I could only integrate my additive expression into the absolute addressing (which is what I wanted at the time). It would be too much of a lift now, but it's planned.
LDA label+1 ; additive expression.
At any rate, I'm writing to see if you'd be interested in merging the changes to your tree.
Thank you for your time.
Bill