Fix terminology: Replace 'inline' with 'in-table' storage #109
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes terminology inconsistency identified in comprehensive cohesion review (COHESION-REVIEW.md Issue #1).
Problem
TERMINOLOGY.md explicitly deprecates "inline storage" → "in-table storage", but several documentation files still used the old term, undermining the authoritative terminology reference.
Changes
Replaced all occurrences of deprecated storage terminology:
Files Changed
✅
how-to/use-object-storage.md:✅
reference/specs/type-system.md:✅
reference/specs/codec-api.md:✅
reference/specs/npy-codec.md:✅
explanation/whats-new-2.md:✅
llms-full.txt: Regenerated to pick up all fixesVerification
Impact
Related