Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[CrashReporter] Enable InProc CrashReporter for crashing GC threads #131821
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[CrashReporter] Enable InProc CrashReporter for crashing GC threads #131821
Changes from all commits
c459806File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I am reading this correctly, we will take
CrashReportSuspensionOwnership::Unavailable;path when encounter a crash on a server GC thread. Is it the behavior we want?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The scenario I was imagining is in Server GC, there is a dedicated heap 0 thread that coordinates suspension, and the crash occurs in a Parallel Server GC worker. I was thinking that since the heap 0 thread controls SuspendEE/RestartEE that it wouldn't be safe to stackwalk other threads if the heap 0 thread can resume independently.
If the crashing thread is the one that owns Suspension, then we are able to walk suspended threads callstacks given it would be the one to RestartEE.
Does that sound right?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In Server GC, the thread that decides to trigger the GC suspends the runtime. Once the runtime is suspended, it signals to server GC threads to do the GC and waits for them to report back that the GC is done. If you get a crash on server GC thread, it should be safe to assume that the runtime is suspended.
Try to run this program that corrupts GC heap with server GC:
When the GC crashes, you should see the crash on GC thread. The main thread should be waiting at:
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.