[wasm] Bump chrome for testing - linux: 117.0.5938.132, windows: 117.0.5938.132 - #3
Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
[wasm] Bump chrome for testing - linux: 117.0.5938.132, windows: 117.0.5938.132#3github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
eduardo-vp
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2024
…#102133) This generalizes the indir reordering optimization (that currently only triggers for loads) to kick in for GT_STOREIND nodes. The main complication with doing this is the fact that the data node of the second indirection needs its own reordering with the previous indirection. The existing logic works by reordering all nodes between the first and second indirection that are unrelated to the second indirection's computation to happen after it. Once that is done we know that there are no uses of the first indirection's result between it and the second indirection, so after doing the necessary interference checks we can safely move the previous indirection to happen after the data node of the second indirection. Example: ```csharp class Body { public double x, y, z, vx, vy, vz, mass; } static void Advance(double dt, Body[] bodies) { foreach (Body b in bodies) { b.x += dt * b.vx; b.y += dt * b.vy; b.z += dt * b.vz; } } ``` Diff: ```diff @@ -1,18 +1,17 @@ -G_M55007_IG04: ;; offset=0x001C +G_M55007_IG04: ;; offset=0x0020 ldr x3, [x0, w1, UXTW #3] ldp d16, d17, [x3, #0x08] ldp d18, d19, [x3, #0x20] fmul d18, d0, d18 fadd d16, d16, d18 - str d16, [x3, #0x08] - fmul d16, d0, d19 - fadd d16, d17, d16 - str d16, [x3, #0x10] + fmul d18, d0, d19 + fadd d17, d17, d18 + stp d16, d17, [x3, #0x08] ldr d16, [x3, #0x18] ldr d17, [x3, #0x30] fmul d17, d0, d17 fadd d16, d16, d17 str d16, [x3, #0x18] add w1, w1, #1 cmp w2, w1 bgt G_M55007_IG04 ```
eduardo-vp
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2024
* bug #1: don't allow for values out of the SerializationRecordType enum range * bug #2: throw SerializationException rather than KeyNotFoundException when the referenced record is missing or it points to a record of different type * bug #3: throw SerializationException rather than FormatException when it's being thrown by BinaryReader (or sth else that we use) * bug #4: document the fact that IOException can be thrown * bug #5: throw SerializationException rather than OverflowException when parsing the decimal fails * bug #6: 0 and 17 are illegal values for PrimitiveType enum * bug #7: throw SerializationException when a surrogate character is read (so far an ArgumentException was thrown)
eduardo-vp
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2025
Currently, offsets are incorrectly treated as indices which is leading to incorrect code being emitted. e.g., `ScatterWithByteOffsets<long>` emits `ST1D Zdata.D, Pg, [Xbase, Zoffsets.D, lsl #3]` instead of, `ST1D Zdata.D, Pg, [Xbase, Zoffsets.D]`
eduardo-vp
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2026
…128163) > [!NOTE] > This PR was authored with assistance from GitHub Copilot. Fixes dotnet#128044. ## Problem createdump SIGSEGVs on Linux when generating a Heap-type minidump for a process running interpreted code. The crash reproduces locally with the `InterpreterStack` DumpTests debuggee and matches the CI failure that prompted `<DumpTypes>Full</DumpTypes>` to be added as a temporary workaround. The faulting backtrace is: ``` #0 Thread::IsAddressInStack threads.cpp:6741 #1 Thread::EnumMemoryRegionsWorker threads.cpp:6909 (calls IsAddressInStack(currentSP)) #2 Thread::EnumMemoryRegions threads.cpp #3 ThreadStore::EnumMemoryRegions #4 ClrDataAccess::EnumMemDumpAllThreadsStack #5 ClrDataAccess::EnumMemoryRegionsWorkerHeap (HEAP2-only path) ``` ## Root cause `Thread::m_pInterpThreadContext` was declared as a raw `InterpThreadContext *`. In non-DAC code that's a normal host pointer, but in DAC mode the field's value is a target-process address. When `IsAddressInStack` (a DAC-callable helper) dereferenced `m_pInterpThreadContext->pStackStart` it read from a target-process address as if it were a host address, which faults inside createdump. ## Fix Change the field type to `PTR_InterpThreadContext` (DPTR), matching the treatment of other Thread fields like `m_pFrame`. In non-DAC builds `DPTR(T)` is just `T*`, so there is no overhead or behavior change. In DAC builds the read goes through `__DPtr<T>` and marshals correctly from the target. Also remove the `<DumpTypes>Full</DumpTypes>` workaround on the `InterpreterStack` DumpTests debuggee so the Heap path that originally failed is exercised again. ## Validation Locally reproduced the original SIGSEGV on Linux x64 with the auto-dump mechanism (`DOTNET_DbgMiniDumpType=2` + `DOTNET_Interpreter=MethodA`) running the `InterpreterStack` debuggee. With this fix applied, createdump produces a complete Heap dump (~74 MB) instead of crashing. --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
eduardo-vp
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2026
An Android production app reported a native abort while building an X.509 chain on arm64. The available tombstone snippet showed the process aborting in `AndroidCryptoNative_X509ChainBuild` from `pal_x509chain.c`, with the native guard reporting that parameter `ctx` was not a valid pointer. The report did not include a repro or full tombstone, but the observed failure mode means managed code reached the native build entry point with a null `X509ChainContext*`. ``` Thread /__w/1/s/src/native/libs/System.Security.Cryptography.Native.Android/pal_x509chain.c:113 (AndroidCryptoNative_X509ChainBuild): Parameter 'ctx' must be a valid pointer *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** pid: 0, tid: 31609 >>> com.app.name <<< backtrace: #00 pc 0x000000000002232c /system/lib64/libc.so (abort+116) #1 pc 0x0000000000021fe8 [removed]-KwPZdoEumri00C7kBm3pQw==/lib/arm64/libSystem.Security.Cryptography.Native.Android.so #2 pc 0x00000000000220b0 [removed]-KwPZdoEumri00C7kBm3pQw==/lib/arm64/libSystem.Security.Cryptography.Native.Android.so (AndroidCryptoNative_X509ChainBuild+88) #3 pc 0x000000000000cfcc ``` `X509ChainContext` is created by `AndroidCryptoNative_X509ChainCreateContext`. That initialization can fail if Android certificate store setup or PKIX parameter construction throws, or if required JNI global references cannot be created. Previously, the managed Android chain path stored the returned `SafeHandle` without checking whether context creation failed, so a later build could pass a null native context to `AndroidCryptoNative_X509ChainBuild` and terminate the app process. This change makes context creation fail gracefully: - The native create path checks Java exceptions around object creation and method calls more consistently. - Partial native contexts are destroyed if global-reference creation fails. - The Android interop wrapper checks the returned chain context immediately, including a null safe-handle return, and throws `CryptographicException` if initialization failed. No regression test is included because the reliable failure modes depend on Android platform/provider state or artificial fault injection, and a test hook would be fragile and not representative. --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Kevin Jones <kevin@vcsjones.com>
eduardo-vp
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2026
…dotnet#131279) [wasm] Restrict enclosing-try throw-helper attach to the same funclet ## Problem crossgen2 emits an invalid WASM (wasm32) R2R module for methods with certain try/catch shapes: the terminal `end` opcode (0x0b) is dropped for an EH funclet, so `wasm-tools validate` (and V8) reject the module with *"function body must end with end opcode"*. A related symptom is a miscomputed branch target depth in the same funclet (tracked as dotnet#131252). ## Root cause The defect is in wasm block layout, in `FgWasm::VisitWasmSuccs` (`src/coreclr/jit/fgwasm.h`). dotnet#130945 added an "enclosing try" relaxation: when a block is a try side-entry and the throw-helper ACD key is `KD_TRY`, the helper is also attached as a successor if ```cpp comp->bbInTryRegions(key.RegionIndex(), block) ``` is true. `bbInTryRegions` is a purely **lexical** try-nesting test — it does not check that the throw helper and the side-entry live in the same **function region (funclet)**. So a throw helper for an outer try region that belongs to the **main method** can be attached to a catch-resumption side-entry (`BBF_CATCH_RESUMPTION`) that merely nests inside that try but physically lives in a **handler funclet**. RPO layout then lays the main-method helper *inside* the funclet, interleaving it with funclet blocks. Because a funclet is a distinct wasm function body, that interleaving drops the funclet's terminal `end` and corrupts its branch target depths. Concrete trace from `System.Data.DataColumn:set_Expression` (instrumented `VisitWasmSuccs`, deduped): ``` sideEntry BB50 (tryIdx=4 hndIdx=3) preds[async=0 catch=1 other=2] pulls dst BB76 (hndIdx=0) crossFunclet=1 sideEntry BB73 (tryIdx=4 hndIdx=3) preds[async=0 catch=1 other=0] pulls dst BB76 (hndIdx=0) crossFunclet=1 ``` BB76 is the throw helper for root try region #4 (`KD_TRY`, no handler index → main method); BB50/BB73 are catch-resumption side-entries in handler funclet #3 (which lexically nests in try #4), so the enclosing-try rule pulls the main-method helper into funclet #3. This is an ordinary catch-resumption EH shape (`async=0`); it is independent of runtime-async, and `fgwasm.h` is byte-identical to `main`. It is latent on `main` only because R2R-wasm codegen isn't enabled there yet. ## Fix Gate the enclosing-try relaxation on same-function-region ownership. A new `funcRegionOf` lambda returns the funclet index that physically contains an arbitrary block (0 == main method); it mirrors `funGetFuncIdx` but works for non-entry blocks and distinguishes a filter funclet from its filter-handler. The helper is attached only when it shares the side-entry's function region: ```cpp if (!viaEnclosingTry || (funcRegionOf(block) == funcRegionOf(acd->acdDstBlk))) { RETURN_ON_ABORT(func(acd->acdDstBlk)); } ``` The exact-match path (a helper keyed to the block's own region) is unchanged, and dotnet#130945's intended case (an inner-try side-entry pulling its enclosing try's helper *within the same funclet*) still matches — so this only removes the cross-funclet edge. ## Validation Standalone `System.Data.Common` R2R wasm crossgen, release JIT, `wasm-tools validate` (only `fgwasm.h` differs between runs): | | `wasm-tools validate` | |---|---| | baseline (`origin/main` layout) | `func 597 failed to validate` ❌ | | with this fix | passes ✅ | ## Notes - Supersedes dotnet#131251, which hardened the terminal-`end` emission (the *effect*); this fixes the *cause* in layout. Closing dotnet#131251 in favor of this. - Related: dotnet#129335 (incomplete predecessor for this defect class, do not reopen); dotnet#130945 (introduced the lexical enclosing-try match); dotnet#131252 (miscomputed branch target depth — same corrupted layout, very likely subsumed by this fix). - Follow-up idea (not in this PR): a JIT-time assert that a funclet's blocks form a contiguous RPO range, so any future mis-layout traps at compile time instead of surfacing as an invalid module. > [!NOTE] > This change was authored with the assistance of GitHub Copilot. --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 2e627b94-2658-41ce-a880-d9c27b7febd9
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.